Difference between revisions of "StarkWare (StarkNet - STRK)"

From CryptoWiki

m (Grand Master Pepe moved page StarkWare to StarkWare (StarkNet - STARK))
Line 4: Line 4:
* Based in Israel ([https://twitter.com/Coin98Insights/status/1519612236138151936?s=20&t=7bztDGfyuJP1Itpsspvy9g 28-4-2022]).
* Based in Israel ([https://twitter.com/Coin98Insights/status/1519612236138151936?s=20&t=7bztDGfyuJP1Itpsspvy9g 28-4-2022]).
*The advantage of zk-[[STARKs]] over [[Zk-SNARK's|zk-SNARKs]] is that it doesn’t require a trusted setup, although the cryptographic proof sizes become much larger.
*The advantage of zk-[[STARKs]] over [[Zk-SNARK's|zk-SNARKs]] is that it doesn’t require a trusted setup, although the cryptographic proof sizes become much larger.
* As the invested [[Consensys Ventures]] [https://media.consensys.net/consensys-ventures-looks-back-on-2018-f572f754bee5 explained]: "''Starkware, co-founded by [[Eli Ben Sasson]], a leading professor in cryptography and founding scientist of [[ZCash (ZEC)|ZCash]], uses their novel [[Zero-Knowledge Proofs|zero knowledge cryptography]] of zk-STARKs to improve scalability and privacy on [[blockchains]]. Starkware is well positioned to become a leader in the growing application of [[zero knowledge proofs]] within [[blockchain]] systems for scalability and privacy, a trend on which we are very [[bullish]].''"
* As the invested [[Consensys Ventures]] [https://media.consensys.net/consensys-ventures-looks-back-on-2018-f572f754bee5 explained]: "''[[Starkware]], co-founded by [[Eli Ben Sasson]], a leading professor in cryptography and founding scientist of [[ZCash (ZEC)|ZCash]], uses their novel [[Zero-Knowledge Proofs|zero knowledge cryptography]] of zk-STARKs to improve scalability and privacy on [[blockchains]]. Starkware is well positioned to become a leader in the growing application of [[zero knowledge proofs]] within [[blockchain]] systems for scalability and privacy, a trend on which we are very [[bullish]].''"
* "''[https://www.theblockcrypto.com/linked/52237/ethereums-scalability-has-potential-to-improve-2000x-due-to-istanbul-update-says-starkware According] (7-1-2020) to StarkWare’s “[https://twitter.com/StarkWareLtd/status/1214236179551412232 measurements] (not approximations, nor estimates),” Ethereum’s scalability has the potential to improve by 2,000 times over [[Ethereum]] [[Layer 1|Layer-1]] after the [[Istanbul]] update. StarkWare said it would [https://twitter.com/StarkWareLtd/status/1214236186602037248?s=20 launch] its [[mainnet]] “soon,”"''
* "''[https://www.theblockcrypto.com/linked/52237/ethereums-scalability-has-potential-to-improve-2000x-due-to-istanbul-update-says-starkware According] (7-1-2020) to StarkWare’s “[https://twitter.com/StarkWareLtd/status/1214236179551412232 measurements] (not approximations, nor estimates),” Ethereum’s scalability has the potential to improve by 2,000 times over [[Ethereum]] [[Layer 1|Layer-1]] after the [[Istanbul]] update. StarkWare said it would [https://twitter.com/StarkWareLtd/status/1214236186602037248?s=20 launch] its [[mainnet]] “soon,”"''


Line 15: Line 15:


=== Admin Keys ===
=== Admin Keys ===
* From a [https://twitter.com/apruden08/status/1548002559515709441? critical post] condemning their [[Decentralized|decentralization]] path a naked cash-out opportunity (16-6-2022):
''"Today, a single party (@StarkWareLtd) fulfills all the roles in [its] system - it (1) [[Bridge|bridges]] tokens [[Layer One|L1]] → [[Layer Two|L2]], (2) sequences [[Transaction (Tx)|txs]], (3) batch executes those txs inside of a STARK proof, and (4) sends the results back. In a [[Proof-of-Stake (PoS)|PoS]] system, the threshold of control is 33%. Just based on the team's ownership alone (30.1%) plus the un-allocated portion of the [[foundation]]'s tokens means that the sequencing will effectively be controlled by a single party (@StarkWareLtd). This is not [[decentralized]].''
''Let's talk about governance. What parameters are being governed? And by what mechanism (token-weighted voting, presumably?) are they changed? It's very unclear, although "major updates to the StarkNet operating system" require the majority of the token holders.''
''Lastly, the final use of the token is "fees to operators on StarkNet". But StarkNet has only one operator: @StarkwareLtd & their prover is [[Closed source|closed-source]]. No discussion of [[Open Source|open-sourcing]] that technology at all, which is where the majority of the economic value will accrue.''
''#Starknet users are paying a subsidy to "core developers" (like [[ZCash (ZEC)|ZCash]] does). Since the core developers will largely consist of the original team members, their ownership will become *more concentrated* over time."''
=== DAO ===
=== DAO ===
=== Treasury ===
=== Treasury ===
Line 59: Line 70:
* [https://twitter.com/messaricrypto/status/1548037753257922566? From] [[Messari]] (16-6-2022):
* [https://twitter.com/messaricrypto/status/1548037753257922566? From] [[Messari]] (16-6-2022):


''"StarkNet is a [[permissionless]] [[Rollups|ZK-Rollup]] built to scale Ethereum. It uses STARK validity proofs to verify transactions. Even though STARK proofs are more computationally intensive, they can be moved [[Off Chain|off-chain]] in comparison to [[Zk-SNARK's|SNARKs]], which leads to higher scalability. Alpha launched on a public [[testnet]] last year and migrated to [[mainnet]] recently."''
''"StarkNet is a [[permissionless]] [[Rollups|ZK-Rollup]] built to scale Ethereum. It uses STARK validity proofs to verify transactions. Even though STARK proofs are more computationally intensive, they can be moved [[Off Chain|off-chain]] in comparison to [[Zk-SNARK's|SNARKs]], which leads to higher scalability. [[Alpha]] launched on a public [[testnet]] last year and migrated to [[mainnet]] recently."''
 
* From a [https://twitter.com/apruden08/status/1548002559515709441? critical post] condemning their [[Decentralized|decentralization]] path a naked cash-out opportunity (16-6-2022):
 
''"Today, a single party (@StarkWareLtd) fulfills all the roles in [its] system - it (1) [[Bridge|bridges]] tokens [[Layer One|L1]] → [[Layer Two|L2]], (2) sequences [[Transaction (Tx)|txs]], (3) batch executes those txs inside of a STARK proof, and (4) sends the results back. In a [[Proof-of-Stake (PoS)|PoS]] system, the threshold of control is 33%. Just based on the team's ownership alone (30.1%) plus the un-allocated portion of the foundation's tokens means that the sequencing will effectively be controlled by a single party (@StarkWareLtd). This is not decentralized."''


=== Fees ===
=== Fees ===
Line 150: Line 165:


''"StarkEx 3.0 brings with it 2 new major features - L1 vaults and SHARed Prover (SHARP) enabling [[DeFi]] pooling and dAMM."''
''"StarkEx 3.0 brings with it 2 new major features - L1 vaults and SHARed Prover (SHARP) enabling [[DeFi]] pooling and dAMM."''
=== StarkNet ===
*[https://ethhub.substack.com/p/ethhub-weekly-194?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0NDcxMjYyOCwiXyI6IjNtM29qIiwiaWF0IjoxNjM4NTAzMjQyLCJleHAiOjE2Mzg1MDY4NDIsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0zOTEwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.fxj7KNJIXFlU3dedTS8cPc7AxdwdpVLaYBGU From] [[EthHub]] (30-11-2021):
''"StarkNet is a [[Public Blockchains|permissionless]] [[decentralized]] [[Rollups|rollup]] operating as an [[Layer Two|L2]] network over Ethereum. This week, StarkNet hit the Ethereum [[mainnet]] in an [[alpha]] fashion."''


=== VeeDo ===
=== VeeDo ===
Line 199: Line 209:
=== Pros ===
=== Pros ===
=== Cons ===
=== Cons ===
* From a [https://twitter.com/apruden08/status/1548002559515709441? critical post] condemning their [[Decentralized|decentralization]] path a naked cash-out opportunity (16-6-2022):
''"Today, a single party (@StarkWareLtd) fulfills all the roles in [its] system - it (1) [[Bridge|bridges]] tokens [[Layer One|L1]] → [[Layer Two|L2]], (2) sequences [[Transaction (Tx)|txs]], (3) batch executes those txs inside of a STARK proof, and (4) sends the results back. In a [[Proof-of-Stake (PoS)|PoS]] system, the threshold of control is 33%. Just based on the team's ownership alone (30.1%) plus the un-allocated portion of the foundation's tokens means that the sequencing will effectively be controlled by a single party (@StarkWareLtd). This is not decentralized.''
''Let's talk about governance. What parameters are being governed? And by what mechanism (token-weighted voting, presumably?) are they changed? It's very unclear, although "major updates to the StarkNet operating system" require the majority of the token holders.''
''Lastly, the final use of the token is "fees to operators on StarkNet". But StarkNet has only one operator: @StarkwareLtd & their prover is [[Closed source|closed-source]]. No discussion of [[Open Source|open-sourcing]] that technology at all, which is where the majority of the economic value will accrue.''
''#Starknet users are paying a subsidy to "core developers" (like [[ZCash (ZEC)|ZCash]] does). Since the core developers will largely consist of the original team members, their ownership will become *more concentrated* over time."''
== Team, Funding, Partners ==
== Team, Funding, Partners ==



Revision as of 03:19, 1 August 2022

Starkware is implementing zk-STARKs in various blockchains including Ethereum.

Basics

Audits & Exploits

Bugs/Exploits

Governance

Admin Keys

"Today, a single party (@StarkWareLtd) fulfills all the roles in [its] system - it (1) bridges tokens L1L2, (2) sequences txs, (3) batch executes those txs inside of a STARK proof, and (4) sends the results back. In a PoS system, the threshold of control is 33%. Just based on the team's ownership alone (30.1%) plus the un-allocated portion of the foundation's tokens means that the sequencing will effectively be controlled by a single party (@StarkWareLtd). This is not decentralized.

Let's talk about governance. What parameters are being governed? And by what mechanism (token-weighted voting, presumably?) are they changed? It's very unclear, although "major updates to the StarkNet operating system" require the majority of the token holders.

Lastly, the final use of the token is "fees to operators on StarkNet". But StarkNet has only one operator: @StarkwareLtd & their prover is closed-source. No discussion of open-sourcing that technology at all, which is where the majority of the economic value will accrue.

#Starknet users are paying a subsidy to "core developers" (like ZCash does). Since the core developers will largely consist of the original team members, their ownership will become *more concentrated* over time."

DAO

Treasury

Token

Launch

  • Token got announced after long speculations and hints ( -2022).

Token Allocation

"@StarkWareLtd has minted 10B tokens off-chain, which is not a fixed supply. +It will be an inflationary asset. There is no planned airdrop for early adopters — heavy emphasis is placed on avoiding rewarding mercenary behavior. Starknet plans to allocate 49.9% of tokens to insiders."

Utility

Other Details

Coin Distribution

Tech (StarkNet)

  • Whitepaper can be found [insert here].
  • Code can be viewed [insert here].
  • Built on: Ethereum

Transaction Details

How it works

"It has 2 core products:

StarkEx is an off-chain scaling engine that is tailored to fit the needs of specific tasks such as trading (dYdX, DeversiFi), NFT (ImmutableX, Sorare)

StarkNet is the bigger version of StarkEx but permissionless"

"StarkNet is a permissionless ZK-Rollup built to scale Ethereum. It uses STARK validity proofs to verify transactions. Even though STARK proofs are more computationally intensive, they can be moved off-chain in comparison to SNARKs, which leads to higher scalability. Alpha launched on a public testnet last year and migrated to mainnet recently."

"Today, a single party (@StarkWareLtd) fulfills all the roles in [its] system - it (1) bridges tokens L1L2, (2) sequences txs, (3) batch executes those txs inside of a STARK proof, and (4) sends the results back. In a PoS system, the threshold of control is 33%. Just based on the team's ownership alone (30.1%) plus the un-allocated portion of the foundation's tokens means that the sequencing will effectively be controlled by a single party (@StarkWareLtd). This is not decentralized."

Fees

"StarkNet’s fee structure upgrade, now requiring fees for settling on @ethereum"

Upgrades

Staking

Liquidity Mining

Scaling

Different Implementations

Interoperability

  • StarkWare’s plans for layer 2 interoperability, aiming at q1 2021:
  1. "StarkEx 2.0 (Nov 2020) will offer L2-L1 interoperability (Fast Withdrawals), using on-chain Conditional Txs.
  2. StarkEx 3.0 (Feb 2021) will offer L2-L2 interoperability across StarkEx systems, using off-chain Conditional Txs."

Other Details

Volition

"Volition is a hybrid on-chain/off-chain data solution that allows users to dynamically pick where they want their data stored. StarkEx will support Volition soon."

Oracle Method

Privacy Method

Compliance

Their Projects

Adamantium Protocol

"Adamantium protocol from StarkWare is a flavor of Validium where a user can keep their own offchain data."

Cairo

"Cairo is the first production-grade platform for generating STARK proofs for general computation. It is Turing Complete, and highly efficient."

dAMM

  • From their blog (29-7-2021):

"We first presented dAMM in March 2021 as Caspian but, due to a trademark issue, Caspian was renamed (long live dAMM). dAMM is an L2 AMM that aggregates liquidity in a single L1 pool and enforces logic with an L1 contract."

"Caspian is a new L2-powered AMM design from StarkWare. This AMM leaves assets on L1, resulting in defragmented liquidity, and better capital efficiency. StarkEx 3.0 (Coming in June 2021) will support Caspian. It will include two new primitives required for implementing Caspian: L1 Limit Orders, and Batch-Long Flash Loans."

DeFi Pooling

DeversiFi DEX

dYdX - StarkEx

"Our engineering teams are collaborating on a Layer 2 scaling solution for Perpetual Contracts, based on StarkWare’s StarkEx scalability engine and dYdX’s Perpetual smart contracts. Our Perpetual Contracts will be powered by StarkEx by the end of this year."

"Through the significant usage StarkEx applications have facilitated, the network has demonstrated a rate of over 9,000 TPS for trades and 18,000 TPS for transfers. With Ethereum’s ~15 TPS for trades, it is a ~600x increase in scalability. On top of that, StarkEx has also reached a peak batch size of 13.5k transactions."

Immutable X

OpenZKP

"OpenZKP is a fully open-source Rust implementation of zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs). OpenZKP includes a partial implementation of the STARKs protocol variant that was pioneered by StarkWare in the StarkDEX testnet demo."

Reddit

"StarkWare Reddit Onboarding Demo

Using StarkEx, the StarkWare team trustlessly onboarded to Ethereum Mainnet 1.3M accounts with initial balances, effectively demonstrating how an entire subreddit the size of r/FortNiteBR (with its Brick tokens) could be brought onto Mainnet. The amortized price per transfer: 600 gas.

The team created no network congestion in the process. They did it over a ~12 hour period while using 2.5% of the network. We paid gas prices that were on average 30% below the average block gas price during this time."

StarkDEX

  • Has designed StarkDEX together with 0x to address DEX scalability with the use of STARK's.
  • StarkEx 3.0 went live. From EthHub (3-8-2021):

"StarkEx 3.0 brings with it 2 new major features - L1 vaults and SHARed Prover (SHARP) enabling DeFi pooling and dAMM."

VeeDo

Roadmap

  • Can be found here (26-1-2021):

"We’re building StarkNet in four steps:

  1. Foundations (completed*)
  2. Planets: Single-App Rollups
  3. Constellations: Multi-App Rollups
  4. Universe: A Decentralized Rollup

We expect to have Step I deployed in a few short months, and be well on our way to Steps II & III by the end of 2021."

Usage

"120+ projects are on StarkNet and StarkEx. TVL of Projects using StarkEx is over $1.1B."

  • StarkEx has settled over $200 billion worth of trades, facilitating about 50 million transactions (16-11-2021).

Projects that use or built on it 

  • For a complete ecosystem overview of Starknet, go check out their dashboard here (7-3-2022).
  • From this tweet (12-10-2020):

"StarkEx will enable ParaSwap to offer inexpensive swaps at scale."

Work with 0x

  • Starkdex — a project between Starkware and 0x — launched a PoC in June 2019. In October, they released OpenZKP, an open source rust implementation of ZKPs. 

“"zero knowledge proofs” or ZKPs for short. A zero knowledge proof allows someone to do a computation on some data and prove that they did this computation correctly, without revealing the data. For example, an account can prove that it summed up all of its expenses correctly without showing what those expenses were.

It is a technology that has been known for about two decades, but as often happens with cryptographic inventions the initial versions where impractically hard to use. In the last couple of years, and thanks to the hard work by Ben-Sasson and many others, ZKP technology has become practical in the form of zkSNARKS. Ben-Sasson and others have developed a new ZKP technology called zkSTARKs. They continue researching and developing this technology as a world-class team called Starkware. Compared to earlier ZKPs, it has better security and it’s easier to produce proofs. It is also refreshingly simple, like great inventions tend to be."

Competition

Pros and Cons

Pros

Cons

"Today, a single party (@StarkWareLtd) fulfills all the roles in [its] system - it (1) bridges tokens L1L2, (2) sequences txs, (3) batch executes those txs inside of a STARK proof, and (4) sends the results back. In a PoS system, the threshold of control is 33%. Just based on the team's ownership alone (30.1%) plus the un-allocated portion of the foundation's tokens means that the sequencing will effectively be controlled by a single party (@StarkWareLtd). This is not decentralized.

Let's talk about governance. What parameters are being governed? And by what mechanism (token-weighted voting, presumably?) are they changed? It's very unclear, although "major updates to the StarkNet operating system" require the majority of the token holders.

Lastly, the final use of the token is "fees to operators on StarkNet". But StarkNet has only one operator: @StarkwareLtd & their prover is closed-source. No discussion of open-sourcing that technology at all, which is where the majority of the economic value will accrue.

#Starknet users are paying a subsidy to "core developers" (like ZCash does). Since the core developers will largely consist of the original team members, their ownership will become *more concentrated* over time."

Team, Funding, Partners

Team

Funding

"Raised $75M led by crypto VC firm Paradigm. Paradigm previously led StarkWare's $30 million fundraise in 2018.. Previous investors, including Sequoia, Founders Fund, and Pantera participated in the round alongside new investors like Three Arrows and Alameda Research."

"The round was led by Sequoia Capital, with participation from existing investors, including Paradigm, Three Arrows Capital, Alameda Research, and Founders Fund. This was an "opportunistic" fundraise, StarkWare co-founder and CEO Uri Kolodny told The Block in an interview, meaning that the company is already profitable but secured new funds to grow its team and ecosystem as fast as possible."

"StarkWare announced the completion of a $100M Series D funding round at an $8B valuation. The funding round was led by FTX and Compound backer Greenoaks Capital, and Moonpay and Alchemy investor Coatue. Other investors in the Series D include Tiger Global."

Partners

"Polaris license under which StarkWare plans to release source code for its STARK prover; Aztec will use the same Polaris license for its PLONK provers (see their post)."

(:

Knowledge empowers all and will help us get closer to the decentralized world we all want to live in!

Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time.

If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to keep expanding this archive of information.

ETH tip address: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31