Difference between revisions of "Liquity (LQTY)"
m (1 revision imported) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
* Started out with LQTY being the stablecoin and having GT (growth tokens), this was changed into LUSD being the stablecoin and LQTY becoming the staking asset. | * Started out with LQTY being the stablecoin and having GT (growth [[tokens]]), this was changed into LUSD being the stablecoin and LQTY becoming the [[staking]] asset. | ||
== Audits & Exploits == | == Audits & Exploits == | ||
*[[Bug bounty]] program can be found [https://medium.com/liquity/announcing-liquitys-bug-bounty-program-fdb6995035be here], with up to $50.000. | *[[Bug bounty]] program can be found [https://medium.com/liquity/announcing-liquitys-bug-bounty-program-fdb6995035be here], with up to $50.000. | ||
*Got a [https://defisafety.com/2021/06/16/liquity/ score] of 84% on [[DeFi Safety]] (16-6-2021): ''"[[Trail of Bits|Trails of Bits]] did a Liquity Proxy Contracts [https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/LiquityProxyContracts.pdf Report] on March 5th 2021. Trails of bits delivered their Liquity Protocol and Stability Pool Final [https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/LiquityProtocolandStabilityPoolFinalReport.pdf Report] on March 25th 2021. [[Coinspect]] did a Liquity [https://www.coinspect.com/liquity-audit/ audit] on March 30th 2021..Trails of Bits did a Liquity security [https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/Liquity.pdf assessment] on January 13th 2021. Liquity was launched April 5th 2021."'' With the [https://docs.defisafety.com/finished-reviews/liquefy comment]: ''"This team has clearly put good effort into their transparency, with high marks all across the board in every category. Good job guys."'' | *Got a [https://defisafety.com/2021/06/16/liquity/ score] of 84% on [[DeFi Safety]] (16-6-2021): ''"[[Trail of Bits|Trails of Bits]] did a Liquity Proxy [[Contracts]] [https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/LiquityProxyContracts.pdf Report] on March 5th 2021. Trails of bits delivered their Liquity Protocol and Stability Pool Final [https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/LiquityProtocolandStabilityPoolFinalReport.pdf Report] on March 25th 2021. [[Coinspect]] did a Liquity [https://www.coinspect.com/liquity-audit/ audit] on March 30th 2021..Trails of Bits did a Liquity security [https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/Liquity.pdf assessment] on January 13th 2021. Liquity was launched April 5th 2021."'' With the [https://docs.defisafety.com/finished-reviews/liquefy comment]: ''"This team has clearly put good effort into their transparency, with high marks all across the board in every category. Good job guys."'' | ||
=== Bugs/ Exploits === | === Bugs/ Exploits === | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*[https://docs.defisafety.com/finished-reviews/liquefy#audits From] [[DeFi Safety]] (16-6-2021): | *[https://docs.defisafety.com/finished-reviews/liquefy#audits From] [[DeFi Safety]] (16-6-2021): | ||
''"[[Admin controls]] can be found [https://github.com/liquity/dev/blob/3d7c9e9e373957cd4eeb5b120e8b996dbfafff7e/README.md#contract-ownership-and-function-permissions here]. All [[Smart Contract (SC)|contracts]] are [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/general#can-liquity-be-upgraded-or-changed described] as immutable. All contracts are automated and immutable upon launch, but no evidence of Pause Control or similar function."'' | ''"[[Admin controls]] can be found [https://github.com/liquity/dev/blob/3d7c9e9e373957cd4eeb5b120e8b996dbfafff7e/README.md#contract-ownership-and-function-permissions here]. All [[Smart Contract (SC)|contracts]] are [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/general#can-liquity-be-upgraded-or-changed described] as [[immutable]]. All contracts are automated and immutable upon launch, but no evidence of Pause Control or similar function."'' | ||
* From their [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/general docs] (9-7-2021): | * From their [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/general docs] (9-7-2021): | ||
''"Liquity contracts have no admin keys and will be accessible via multiple interfaces hosted by different [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/frontend-operators Frontend Operators], making it censorship resistant. Liquity has no admin key, and nobody can alter the rules of the system in any way. The smart contract code is completely immutable."'' | ''"Liquity contracts have no [[admin keys]] and will be accessible via multiple interfaces hosted by different [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/frontend-operators Frontend Operators], making it censorship resistant. Liquity has no [[admin key]], and nobody can alter the rules of the system in any way. The smart [[contract]] code is completely immutable."'' | ||
=== DAO === | === DAO === | ||
* LQTY is not a governance token, as there is [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/lqty-distribution-and-rewards no] Liquity governance. | * LQTY is not a governance [[token]], as there is [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/lqty-distribution-and-rewards no] Liquity governance. | ||
=== Treasury === | === Treasury === | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* From their [https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-launch-details-4537c5ffa9ea blog] (25-3-2021): | * From their [https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-launch-details-4537c5ffa9ea blog] (25-3-2021): | ||
''"100,000,000 LQTY tokens will be minted at genesis and will be allocated as follows:'' | ''"100,000,000 LQTY tokens will be minted at [[genesis]] and will be allocated as follows:'' | ||
# ''35.3% to the Liquity Community. 32,000,000 LQTY will be allocated to the LQTY rewards pool. These tokens are earned through Stability Pool deposits and will be rewarded by the protocol to frontends and Stability Providers. 1,333,333 LQTY will be allocated to LPs of the LUSD:ETH Uniswap pool. These tokens are earned by staking LUSD:ETH Uniswap LP tokens and will be distributed by the protocol over the course of 6 weeks. 2,000,000 LQTY will be allocated in the form of a Community Reserve. These tokens are earmarked from the Liquity AG endowment and will be used to fund grants, hackathons, events, and other community-focused efforts.'' | # ''35.3% to the Liquity Community. 32,000,000 LQTY will be allocated to the LQTY rewards pool. These tokens are earned through Stability Pool deposits and will be rewarded by the protocol to frontends and Stability Providers. 1,333,333 LQTY will be allocated to LPs of the LUSD:ETH [[Uniswap]] pool. These tokens are earned by staking LUSD:ETH Uniswap LP tokens and will be [[distributed]] by the protocol over the course of 6 weeks. 2,000,000 LQTY will be allocated in the form of a Community Reserve. These tokens are earmarked from the Liquity AG endowment and will be used to fund grants, hackathons, events, and other community-focused efforts.'' | ||
# ''23.7% to Team and Advisors. 23,664,633 LQTY have been allocated to current (and future) Liquity AG employees and advisors. All LQTY in this category are under a 1 year lockup and are 1/4 vested after 1 year of engagement, then 1/36 every month after.'' | # ''23.7% to Team and Advisors. 23,664,633 LQTY have been allocated to current (and future) Liquity AG employees and advisors. All LQTY in this category are under a 1 year lockup and are 1/4 vested after 1 year of engagement, then 1/36 every month after.'' | ||
# ''33.9% to Investors. 33,902,679 LQTY have been allocated to Liquity’s early investors who supported our vision and provided the runway necessary for us to succeed long term. All LQTY in this category are under a 1 year lockup.'' | # ''33.9% to Investors. 33,902,679 LQTY have been allocated to Liquity’s early investors who supported our vision and provided the runway necessary for us to succeed long term. All LQTY in this category are under a 1 year lockup.'' | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
# ''Depositing LUSD into the Stability Pool.'' | # ''Depositing LUSD into the Stability Pool.'' | ||
# ''Facilitating Stability Pool deposits through a frontend.'' | # ''Facilitating Stability Pool deposits through a frontend.'' | ||
# ''Providing liquidity to the LUSD:ETH Uniswap pool.'' | # ''Providing [[liquidity]] to the LUSD:ETH Uniswap pool.'' | ||
''LQTY's community issuance (outside of LP incentives and the Community Reserve) follows a yearly halving schedule."'' | ''LQTY's community issuance (outside of LP incentives and the Community Reserve) follows a yearly halving schedule."'' | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
''"There are basically two different ways to generate revenue using Liquity:'' | ''"There are basically two different ways to generate revenue using Liquity:'' | ||
''1. Deposit LUSD to the Stability Pool and earn liquidation gains and LQTY rewards'' | ''1. Deposit LUSD to the Stability Pool and [[earn]] liquidation gains and LQTY rewards'' | ||
''2. Stake LQTY and earn the revenue from issuance fees (in LUSD) and redemption fees (in ETH)"'' | ''2. [[Stake]] LQTY and earn the revenue from issuance [[fees]] (in LUSD) and redemption fees (in ETH)"'' | ||
* [https://twitter.com/0xWangarian/status/1391680711128621056 From] [[0xWangarian]] (10-5-2021): | * [https://twitter.com/0xWangarian/status/1391680711128621056 From] [[0xWangarian]] (10-5-2021): | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
* From the [https://www.liquity.org/features website] (9-7-2021): | * From the [https://www.liquity.org/features website] (9-7-2021): | ||
''"The system captures the revenue from the borrowing and redemption fees and pays it out on a pro rata basis to the stakers of the LQTY token. The tokens can be staked and unstaked any time with no minimum lockup period."'' | ''"The system captures the revenue from the borrowing and redemption fees and pays it out on a pro rata basis to the [[stakers]] of the LQTY token. The tokens can be [[staked]] and unstaked any time with no minimum lockup period."'' | ||
These staked tokens are not the same tokens that fund the Stability Fund. This gets funded by depositing LUSD and getting LQTY and kickbacks from frontends. | These staked tokens are not the same tokens that fund the Stability Fund. This gets funded by depositing LUSD and getting LQTY and kickbacks from frontends. | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
== Coin Distribution == | == Coin Distribution == | ||
* When we look at current (9-7-2021) holder numbers, there are [https://etherscan.io/token/0x6DEA81C8171D0bA574754EF6F8b412F2Ed88c54D 4839 holders]. The token holder supply distribution is not a clear cut case on Etherscan, since the top 30 are framed as contracts (with the top three having 38, 27 and 9.4% respectively). When we look at LUSD, it has fewer holders (you would think otherwise), namely [https://etherscan.io/token/0x5f98805A4E8be255a32880FDeC7F6728C6568bA0 2491]. The founder came out [https://medium.com/liquity/addressing-concerns-about-liquity-2af3e1d0a946 saying] (1-7-2021) around 90% of LUSD is in the stability fund, also saying a couple whales were mostly behind this. | * When we look at current (9-7-2021) holder numbers, there are [https://etherscan.io/token/0x6DEA81C8171D0bA574754EF6F8b412F2Ed88c54D 4839 holders]. The token holder supply distribution is not a clear cut [[case]] on [[Etherscan]], since the top 30 are framed as contracts (with the top three having 38, 27 and 9.4% respectively). When we look at LUSD, it has fewer holders (you would think otherwise), namely [https://etherscan.io/token/0x5f98805A4E8be255a32880FDeC7F6728C6568bA0 2491]. The founder came out [https://medium.com/liquity/addressing-concerns-about-liquity-2af3e1d0a946 saying] (1-7-2021) around 90% of LUSD is in the stability fund, also saying a couple whales were mostly behind this. | ||
== Tech == | == Tech == | ||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
"''The Stability Pool is Liquity’s primary mechanism to instantly absorb troves with insufficient collateral. It is maintained by users who deposit LQTY in exchange for the future collateral of liquidated troves. When a trove falls below the minimum collateral ratio of 110%, the system liquidates its debt by [[burning]] an identical amount of LQTY tokens held in a Stability Pool. This stands in contrast to existing platforms which auction off collateral in a lengthy process, facing difficult market situations and further price drops.'' | "''The Stability Pool is Liquity’s primary mechanism to instantly absorb troves with insufficient collateral. It is maintained by users who deposit LQTY in exchange for the future collateral of liquidated troves. When a trove falls below the minimum collateral ratio of 110%, the system liquidates its debt by [[burning]] an identical amount of LQTY tokens held in a Stability Pool. This stands in contrast to existing platforms which auction off collateral in a lengthy process, facing difficult market situations and further price drops.'' | ||
''In return for the LQTY that is burned from the Stability Pool, all the collateral of each liquidated trove is sent to the Stability Pool and distributed proportionally among all depositors. This mechanism is expected to yield a net gain to the depositors: the collateral is almost always worth more (in USD) than the LQTY tokens that are burned to offset the debt. This holds because the liquidation is triggered below a collateral ratio of 110%, but with a very high probability above 100%.'' | ''In return for the LQTY that is [[burned]] from the Stability Pool, all the collateral of each liquidated trove is sent to the Stability Pool and distributed proportionally among all depositors. This mechanism is expected to yield a net gain to the depositors: the collateral is almost always worth more (in USD) than the LQTY tokens that are burned to offset the debt. This holds because the liquidation is triggered below a collateral ratio of 110%, but with a very high probability above 100%.'' | ||
''If the amount of LQTY in the Stability Pool goes to zero, the system moves to the second phase of the liquidation process in which it redistributes the remaining defaulted troves to all existing troves, in proportion to their collateral ratio. This means that troves which are heavily collateralized will receive more debt and collateral from liquidated positions than those with low collateralization, ensuring that the system doesn’t create cascading liquidations. By redistributing the riskiest positions to the safest and adjusting the incentive structure in times of low collateralization, Liquity quickly stabilizes itself via direct feedback loops.'' | ''If the amount of LQTY in the Stability Pool goes to zero, the system moves to the second phase of the liquidation process in which it redistributes the remaining defaulted troves to all existing troves, in proportion to their collateral ratio. This means that troves which are heavily collateralized will receive more debt and collateral from liquidated positions than those with low collateralization, ensuring that the system doesn’t create cascading liquidations. By redistributing the riskiest positions to the safest and adjusting the incentive structure in times of low collateralization, Liquity quickly stabilizes itself via direct feedback loops.'' | ||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
''"Allows lenders to provide Ether as collateral with 0% interest. Under normal circumstances they operate under a 110% collateralization ratio, a very low ratio for the industry, and a ratio which potentially allows up to 11x leverage.'' | ''"Allows lenders to provide Ether as collateral with 0% interest. Under normal circumstances they operate under a 110% collateralization ratio, a very low ratio for the industry, and a ratio which potentially allows up to 11x leverage.'' | ||
''Users who lend Ether to receive LUSD open what they call a trove. All troves require a refundable deposit of $200 LUSD be included to cover gas costs. Users can collateralize as they like, provided their collateral ratio exceeds 110%.'' | ''Users who lend Ether to receive LUSD open what they call a trove. All troves require a refundable deposit of $200 LUSD be included to [[cover]] gas costs. Users can collateralize as they like, provided their collateral ratio exceeds 110%.'' | ||
''That is, if you open a trove with a deposit for $30,000 worth of ETH, a loan of $10,000 would be 300% collateralized and relatively safer against a price drop. A loan of $27,000 would be closer to the 110% minimum and a relatively small price drop in Ethereum would subject such a trove to liquidation."'' | ''That is, if you open a trove with a deposit for $30,000 worth of ETH, a loan of $10,000 would be 300% collateralized and relatively safer against a price drop. A loan of $27,000 would be closer to the 110% minimum and a relatively small price drop in [[Ethereum]] would subject such a trove to liquidation."'' | ||
=== Fee Mechanism === | === Fee Mechanism === | ||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
# ''For redeemers, there is a redemption fee on the amount paid to users by the system (in [[Ethereum (ETH)|ETH]]) when exchanging LUSD for ETH. Note that redemption is separate from repaying your loan as a borrower, which is free of charge.'' | # ''For redeemers, there is a redemption fee on the amount paid to users by the system (in [[Ethereum (ETH)|ETH]]) when exchanging LUSD for ETH. Note that redemption is separate from repaying your loan as a borrower, which is free of charge.'' | ||
''Both fees depend on the redemption volumes, i.e. they increase upon every redemption in function of the redeemed amount, and decay over time as long as no redemptions take place. The intent is to throttle large redemptions with higher fees, and to throttle borrowing directly after large redemption volumes. The fee decay over time ensures that the fee for both borrowers and redeemers will “cool down”, while redemptions volumes are low. The fees cannot become smaller than <code>0.5%</code> (except in [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/recovery-mode#what-are-the-fees-during-recovery-mode Recovery Mode]), which protects the redemption facility from being misused by arbitrageurs front-running the price feed. The borrowing fee is capped at <code>5%</code>, keeping the system (somewhat) attractive for borrowers even in phases where the monetary is contracting due to redemptions."'' | ''Both fees depend on the redemption volumes, i.e. they increase upon every redemption in function of the redeemed amount, and decay over time as long as no redemptions take place. The intent is to throttle large redemptions with higher fees, and to throttle borrowing directly after large redemption volumes. The fee decay over time ensures that the fee for both borrowers and redeemers will “cool down”, while redemptions volumes are low. The fees cannot become smaller than <code>0.5%</code> (except in [https://docs.liquity.org/faq/recovery-mode#what-are-the-fees-during-recovery-mode Recovery Mode]), which protects the redemption facility from being misused by arbitrageurs [[front-running]] the price feed. The borrowing fee is capped at <code>5%</code>, keeping the system (somewhat) attractive for borrowers even in phases where the monetary is contracting due to redemptions."'' | ||
=== Upgrades === | === Upgrades === | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
* From the [https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-decentralized-borrowing-5a4b0eb28efc announcement] (4-5-2020): | * From the [https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-decentralized-borrowing-5a4b0eb28efc announcement] (4-5-2020): | ||
"''High-collateral borrowers and Stability Pool depositors provide stability to the system. They are rewarded for their roles by receiving collateral surplus gains from troves that are liquidated. In addition, the depositors will receive Growth Tokens (GT) as a kickback from front ends. GT can be staked in order to earn a proportion of the protocol revenue stemming from issuance and redemption fees."'' | "''High-collateral borrowers and Stability Pool depositors provide stability to the system. They are rewarded for their roles by receiving collateral surplus gains from troves that are liquidated. In addition, the depositors will receive Growth Tokens (GT) as a [[kickback]] from front ends. GT can be staked in order to earn a proportion of the protocol revenue stemming from issuance and redemption fees."'' | ||
* [https://defirate.com/liquity-launch/ From] [[DeFi Rate]] (11-5-2020): | * [https://defirate.com/liquity-launch/ From] [[DeFi Rate]] (11-5-2020): | ||
"''The protocol intends to distribute GT to two user groups: front-ends and stability pool depositors. Front-ends are applications/products that interact with the protocol. Front-end applications retain the ability to determine the kickback rate to its users. Therefore, products that interact with the Liquity are ultimately competing with the kickback rates of other applications."'' | "''The protocol intends to distribute GT to two user groups: front-ends and stability pool depositors. Front-ends are applications/products that interact with the protocol. Front-end applications retain the ability to determine the kickback rate to its users. Therefore, products that interact with the Liquity are ultimately competing with the kickback rates of other applications."'' | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
* From the [https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-decentralized-borrowing-5a4b0eb28efc announcement] (4-5-2020): | * From the [https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-decentralized-borrowing-5a4b0eb28efc announcement] (4-5-2020): | ||
"''The value of LQTY in the system is fixed at $1. This means that at any time, a user can redeem 1 LQTY for its corresponding value in ETH. Whenever 1 LQTY trades below $1, holders and arbitrageurs are incentivized to redeem 1 LQTY for $1 worth of ETH. This helps to stabilize the price of LQTY through direct arbitrage rather than by relying on indirect monetary interventions like variable interest rates set by governance."'' | "''The value of LQTY in the system is fixed at $1. This means that at any time, a user can redeem 1 LQTY for its corresponding value in ETH. Whenever 1 LQTY trades below $1, holders and arbitrageurs are incentivized to redeem 1 LQTY for $1 worth of ETH. This helps to stabilize the price of LQTY through direct [[arbitrage]] rather than by relying on indirect monetary interventions like variable interest rates set by governance."'' | ||
== Privacy Method == | == Privacy Method == | ||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
== Usage == | == Usage == | ||
* [https:// | * [https://ournetwork.substack.com/p/ournetwork-issue-108?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0ODYwNTY5NCwiXyI6IllXeFVGIiwiaWF0IjoxNjQ1OTI5MDQ1LCJleHAiOjE2NDU5MzI2NDUsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yMTM2MiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.uPH_b0VP906hDnbi2J2GO1G3rjgQbxv1FeS_95mHuE8&utm_source=url&s=r From] [[Our Network]] (12-2-2022): | ||
''" | ''"Numerous projects have adopted LUSD due to its [[decentralization]], but the most notable are [[Olympus (OHM)|OlympusDAO]], [[Fei Protocol (FEI)|Fei Protocol]], and [[Synthetix Network Tokens (SNX)|Synthetix]]. Whether it's for the treasury, as a form of collateral, or as a source of yield, these projects have accumulated and utilized a combined 230m LUSD."'' | ||
* Around [https://medium.com/liquity/addressing-concerns-about-liquity-2af3e1d0a946 90%] of the total LUSD supply is held in the Stability Pool. However, the stats are heavily skewed by some big [[whales]] that have deposited most or all of their borrowed LUSD to the Stability Pool (9-7-2021). | |||
* [https://www.liquity.org/ Reached] a TVL of $2.7B by 9-7-2021. | |||
* [https://ournetwork.substack.com/p/our-network-issue-72?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjozNjY5MjUyNiwiXyI6IitrN3VtIiwiaWF0IjoxNjIzMDQ3MjM1LCJleHAiOjE2MjMwNTA4MzUsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yMTM2MiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.KqewdTrw9dXbtkA6gFdHR6N-OJL From] [[Our Network]] (22-5-2021): | *[https://ournetwork.substack.com/p/our-network-issue-72?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjozNjY5MjUyNiwiXyI6IitrN3VtIiwiaWF0IjoxNjIzMDQ3MjM1LCJleHAiOjE2MjMwNTA4MzUsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yMTM2MiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.KqewdTrw9dXbtkA6gFdHR6N-OJL From] [[Our Network]] (22-5-2021): | ||
''"Liquity does not charge interest on loans, but instead charges a one-time borrow fee up front ranging from 0.5% to 5% (most often ~0.5%). The borrow fees combined with redemption fees are distributed directly to LQTY [[Staker|stakers]] and have generated >$10.3M in protocol revenue since launch."'' | ''"Liquity does not charge interest on loans, but instead charges a one-time borrow fee up front ranging from 0.5% to 5% (most often ~0.5%). The borrow fees combined with redemption fees are distributed directly to LQTY [[Staker|stakers]] and have generated >$10.3M in protocol revenue since launch."'' | ||
* [https:// | *[https://doseofdefi.substack.com/p/coinbase-and-defi?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjozNTMyOTUwMSwiXyI6IkNDcGZjIiwiaWF0IjoxNjE4ODg2MzYzLCJleHAiOjE2MTg4ODk5NjMsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yNTk5NyIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.t9-Qm8Pm23HH6xXHaduysUw2UJEf33 From] [[Dose Of DeFi|Dose of DeFi]] (20-4-2021): | ||
''"Liquity [https://twitter.com/LiquityProtocol/status/1382730974073479172 reaches] $1bn [[TVL]] in 10 days."'' | |||
=== Projects that use or built on it === | === Projects that use or built on it === | ||
Line 192: | Line 196: | ||
''"There are a few major differences with Liquity. For one, there’s no stability fee or interest rate that accrues over time. Instead, depositors incur a one-time issuance fee when LQTY is minted and a one-time redemption fee when LQTY is redeemed for the underlying collateral – in this case Ether. In addition, Liquity features a significantly lower collateralization ratio of 110% compared to Maker’s 150%, effectively allowing depositors to draw more liquidity from the protocol with the same amount of ETH.'' | ''"There are a few major differences with Liquity. For one, there’s no stability fee or interest rate that accrues over time. Instead, depositors incur a one-time issuance fee when LQTY is minted and a one-time redemption fee when LQTY is redeemed for the underlying collateral – in this case Ether. In addition, Liquity features a significantly lower collateralization ratio of 110% compared to Maker’s 150%, effectively allowing depositors to draw more liquidity from the protocol with the same amount of ETH.'' | ||
''Second, one of the biggest drawbacks with the Maker system is the reliance on Keeper’s to liquidate under-collateralized vaults. Running a Maker Keeper bot requires some in-depth technical knowledge, creating some barriers to entry for participating in a critical piece of the system. This is ultimately what led to a significant amount of Vault owners being liquidated for 100% of their collateral during [[Black Thursday]] as millions in ETH was liquidated for 0 DAI.'' | ''Second, one of the biggest drawbacks with the Maker system is the reliance on Keeper’s to liquidate under-collateralized vaults. Running a Maker Keeper bot requires some in-depth technical knowledge, creating some barriers to entry for participating in a critical piece of the system. This is ultimately what led to a significant amount of [[Vault]] owners being liquidated for 100% of their collateral during [[Black Thursday]] as millions in ETH was liquidated for 0 DAI.'' | ||
''To combat this, Liquity instead relies on stability pools to liquidate undercollateralized CDPs. These stability pools comprise of LQTY tokens that any user can deposit. If a CDP falls below 110% collateralization ratio, the position is liquidated and a corresponding amount of LQTY is burned. In return for depositing LQTY into the stability pool, users are given the ETH collateral distributed pro-rata to depositors at a discount (generally between 100 – 110% of the position’s value)."'' | ''To combat this, Liquity instead relies on stability pools to liquidate undercollateralized CDPs. These stability pools comprise of LQTY tokens that any user can deposit. If a CDP falls below 110% collateralization ratio, the position is liquidated and a corresponding amount of LQTY is burned. In return for depositing LQTY into the stability pool, users are given the ETH collateral distributed pro-rata to depositors at a discount (generally between 100 – 110% of the position’s value)."'' | ||
Line 202: | Line 206: | ||
=== Funding === | === Funding === | ||
* [https:// | * [https://ournetwork.substack.com/p/ournetwork-issue-108?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0ODYwNTY5NCwiXyI6IllXeFVGIiwiaWF0IjoxNjQ1OTI5MDQ1LCJleHAiOjE2NDU5MzI2NDUsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yMTM2MiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.uPH_b0VP906hDnbi2J2GO1G3rjgQbxv1FeS_95mHuE8&utm_source=url&s=r From] [[Our Network]] (12-2-2022): | ||
''"Liquity has excelled in generating yield. Since launch, LUSD holders in the Stability Pool have earned ~67.5k ETH from liquidations at a ~9% discount, while LQTY stakers have earned ~$27m in revenue from protocol fees — an 86% increase from total revenue in September."'' | |||
* [[Matter Labs]]; [https://medium.com/matter-labs/funding-ea89c1fa731e according] to Matter Labs, the founders and leadership of a bunch of DeFi projects, among which this project, joined in on the $50m raise for [[zkSync]] (8-11-2021). | |||
* [https://cointelegraph.com/news/pantera-capital-backs-liquidity-protocol-s-6m-series-a-funding-round From] [[CoinTelegraph|Cointelegraph]] (29-3-2021): | *[https://cointelegraph.com/news/pantera-capital-backs-liquidity-protocol-s-6m-series-a-funding-round From] [[CoinTelegraph|Cointelegraph]] (29-3-2021): | ||
''"Liquity Protocol has secured $6 million in Series A funding. The funding round was led by [[Pantera Capital]], a crypto-focused venture capital firm, with additional contributions from Nima Capital, [[FTX (FTT)|Alameda Research]], Greenfield.one and [[IOSG Ventures|IOSG]], the company announced Monday. Angel investors including [[Meltem Demirors]], [[David Hoffman]] and [[Calvin Liu]] also contributed to the raise."'' | ''"Liquity Protocol has secured $6 million in Series A funding. The funding round was led by [[Pantera Capital]], a crypto-focused venture capital firm, with additional contributions from Nima Capital, [[FTX (FTT)|Alameda Research]], Greenfield.one and [[IOSG Ventures|IOSG]], the company announced Monday. Angel investors including [[Meltem Demirors]], [[David Hoffman]] and [[Calvin Liu]] also contributed to the raise."'' | ||
*[https://ethhub.substack.com/p/ethhub-weekly-133?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0Njk2MjQzLCJfIjoiMG96ZDgiLCJpYXQiOjE2MDEzODgxMTUsImV4cCI6MTYwMTM5MTcxNSwiaXNzIjoicHViLTM5MTAiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.PdHHGuJUEL2X3j9xNaN8Ek1L3B4v6tLtWkQAfH9QOFY From] [[EthHub]] #133 (28-9-2020): | |||
* | "''Raised $2.4M. The round was led by [[Polychain]] Capital, with follow on investments from [[a_capital]], [[Lemniscap]], [[1kx]], [[DFINITY Ecosystem Fund]], [[Robot Ventures]] ([[Robert Leshner]]), and [[Alex Pack]]."'' | ||
=== Partners=== | === Partners=== | ||
Line 217: | Line 223: | ||
Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time. | Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time. | ||
If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to keep expanding this archive of information. | If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to [[keep]] expanding this archive of information. | ||
[[ETH]] tip [[address]]: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31 | [[ETH]] tip [[address]]: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31 |
Revision as of 08:40, 7 March 2022
Basics
- Based in: Zug, Switzerland
- Started in: early 2020
- Testnet release: is on Kovan testnet (27-12-2020).
- Mainnet release: will launch in April 5th 2021 (did so).
- Liquity is an algorithmic governance, low collateralization, and interest-free lending protocol with many similarities to the Maker system.
History
- Started out with LQTY being the stablecoin and having GT (growth tokens), this was changed into LUSD being the stablecoin and LQTY becoming the staking asset.
Audits & Exploits
- Bug bounty program can be found here, with up to $50.000.
- Got a score of 84% on DeFi Safety (16-6-2021): "Trails of Bits did a Liquity Proxy Contracts Report on March 5th 2021. Trails of bits delivered their Liquity Protocol and Stability Pool Final Report on March 25th 2021. Coinspect did a Liquity audit on March 30th 2021..Trails of Bits did a Liquity security assessment on January 13th 2021. Liquity was launched April 5th 2021." With the comment: "This team has clearly put good effort into their transparency, with high marks all across the board in every category. Good job guys."
Bugs/ Exploits
Governance
Admin Keys
- From DeFi Safety (16-6-2021):
"Admin controls can be found here. All contracts are described as immutable. All contracts are automated and immutable upon launch, but no evidence of Pause Control or similar function."
- From their docs (9-7-2021):
"Liquity contracts have no admin keys and will be accessible via multiple interfaces hosted by different Frontend Operators, making it censorship resistant. Liquity has no admin key, and nobody can alter the rules of the system in any way. The smart contract code is completely immutable."
DAO
Treasury
Token
Launch
"Liquity will launch in April 5th 2021 with LQTY rewards available at launch. The app will be fully functional at launch minus redemptions."
Token allocation
- From their blog (25-3-2021):
"100,000,000 LQTY tokens will be minted at genesis and will be allocated as follows:
- 35.3% to the Liquity Community. 32,000,000 LQTY will be allocated to the LQTY rewards pool. These tokens are earned through Stability Pool deposits and will be rewarded by the protocol to frontends and Stability Providers. 1,333,333 LQTY will be allocated to LPs of the LUSD:ETH Uniswap pool. These tokens are earned by staking LUSD:ETH Uniswap LP tokens and will be distributed by the protocol over the course of 6 weeks. 2,000,000 LQTY will be allocated in the form of a Community Reserve. These tokens are earmarked from the Liquity AG endowment and will be used to fund grants, hackathons, events, and other community-focused efforts.
- 23.7% to Team and Advisors. 23,664,633 LQTY have been allocated to current (and future) Liquity AG employees and advisors. All LQTY in this category are under a 1 year lockup and are 1/4 vested after 1 year of engagement, then 1/36 every month after.
- 33.9% to Investors. 33,902,679 LQTY have been allocated to Liquity’s early investors who supported our vision and provided the runway necessary for us to succeed long term. All LQTY in this category are under a 1 year lockup.
- 6.1% to Liquity AG Endowment. 6,063,988 LQTY have been allocated to Liquity AG for use by the company. These tokens are subject to a 1 year lockup.
- 1% to Service Providers. 1,035,367 LQTY have been allocated to service providers who helped Liquity in various ways before launch. These tokens are subject to a 1 year lockup."
- From their docs (4-2021):
"LQTY is earned in three ways:
- Depositing LUSD into the Stability Pool.
- Facilitating Stability Pool deposits through a frontend.
- Providing liquidity to the LUSD:ETH Uniswap pool.
LQTY's community issuance (outside of LP incentives and the Community Reserve) follows a yearly halving schedule."
- From the website (9-7-2021):
"Frontend Operators provide a web interface to the end-user enabling them to interact with the Liquity protocol. For that service, they will be rewarded with a share of the LQTY tokens their users generate. How much each party gets is determined by the kickback rate which is set by the Frontend Operator and can range between 0% and 100%."
Utility
- LUSD is the protocol’s native stablecoin which is pegged to the US Dollar. From the website (9-7-2021):
"There are basically two different ways to generate revenue using Liquity:
1. Deposit LUSD to the Stability Pool and earn liquidation gains and LQTY rewards
2. Stake LQTY and earn the revenue from issuance fees (in LUSD) and redemption fees (in ETH)"
- From 0xWangarian (10-5-2021):
"All $LQTY holders are rewarded with 25% of all the $FLTY tokens over the course of 2 years."
- From the website (9-7-2021):
"The system captures the revenue from the borrowing and redemption fees and pays it out on a pro rata basis to the stakers of the LQTY token. The tokens can be staked and unstaked any time with no minimum lockup period."
These staked tokens are not the same tokens that fund the Stability Fund. This gets funded by depositing LUSD and getting LQTY and kickbacks from frontends.
Token Details
- From the announcement (4-5-2020):
"Like existing stablecoin systems, Liquity allows users to mint tokens in a self-service manner; however, other systems have complex governance mechanisms which are required to maintain the USD-peg by updating fees or interest rates. Liquity replaces the need for interests and human intervention by algorithmically adjusted redemption and loan issuance fees to support its currency. Both fees are initially set to 0% and increase with the redeemed amounts, while tending to return to zero in times of low redemption activity.
A borrower first locks up Ether in a smart contract and creates an individual liquidity position called a “trove”. Each trove is required to have a minimum collateralization ratio of only 110%, which is unparalleled in DeFi space. The borrower can then mint LQTY tokens, which are calculated as a debt against collateral. For Ether that is worth $100, the borrower can obtain up to 90.09 LQTY. When the borrower is ready to retrieve their collateral, they simply return the LQTY to the contract to repay their loan and free up their collateral."
Coin Distribution
- When we look at current (9-7-2021) holder numbers, there are 4839 holders. The token holder supply distribution is not a clear cut case on Etherscan, since the top 30 are framed as contracts (with the top three having 38, 27 and 9.4% respectively). When we look at LUSD, it has fewer holders (you would think otherwise), namely 2491. The founder came out saying (1-7-2021) around 90% of LUSD is in the stability fund, also saying a couple whales were mostly behind this.
Tech
- Whitepaper can be found [insert here].
- Code can be viewed [insert here].
- Built on: Ethereum
How it works
- From their website (9-7-2021):
"The core team building the protocol will not operate a frontend. Liquity is instead accessed by third-party frontend applications and integration services."
- From the announcement (4-5-2020):
"The Stability Pool is Liquity’s primary mechanism to instantly absorb troves with insufficient collateral. It is maintained by users who deposit LQTY in exchange for the future collateral of liquidated troves. When a trove falls below the minimum collateral ratio of 110%, the system liquidates its debt by burning an identical amount of LQTY tokens held in a Stability Pool. This stands in contrast to existing platforms which auction off collateral in a lengthy process, facing difficult market situations and further price drops.
In return for the LQTY that is burned from the Stability Pool, all the collateral of each liquidated trove is sent to the Stability Pool and distributed proportionally among all depositors. This mechanism is expected to yield a net gain to the depositors: the collateral is almost always worth more (in USD) than the LQTY tokens that are burned to offset the debt. This holds because the liquidation is triggered below a collateral ratio of 110%, but with a very high probability above 100%.
If the amount of LQTY in the Stability Pool goes to zero, the system moves to the second phase of the liquidation process in which it redistributes the remaining defaulted troves to all existing troves, in proportion to their collateral ratio. This means that troves which are heavily collateralized will receive more debt and collateral from liquidated positions than those with low collateralization, ensuring that the system doesn’t create cascading liquidations. By redistributing the riskiest positions to the safest and adjusting the incentive structure in times of low collateralization, Liquity quickly stabilizes itself via direct feedback loops.
As a final backstop, the system provides a Recovery mode. Recovery mode is triggered if total system collateralization falls below the Critical Collateral Ratio, set to 150%. When this happens, the riskiest troves are liquidated (even if they are over 110% collateralized) until the Critical Collateral Ratio threshold is met. The Recovery mode acts a self-negating deterrent: the possibility of it actually guides the system away from ever reaching it. These measures ensure that the system’s overall collateralization ratio stays at a healthy level.
When redeemed, the system uses the received LQTY to repay the riskiest trove(s) with the lowest collateral ratios and transfers the respective amount of ETH to the redeemer. While redemption causes no net loss to the affected borrowers (who lose the same amount of debt as they lose collateral), it has a positive effect on the overall collateralization of the system. This also creates an incentive to make sure that troves are sufficiently collateralized relative to all other troves, improving overall system security."
"Allows lenders to provide Ether as collateral with 0% interest. Under normal circumstances they operate under a 110% collateralization ratio, a very low ratio for the industry, and a ratio which potentially allows up to 11x leverage.
Users who lend Ether to receive LUSD open what they call a trove. All troves require a refundable deposit of $200 LUSD be included to cover gas costs. Users can collateralize as they like, provided their collateral ratio exceeds 110%.
That is, if you open a trove with a deposit for $30,000 worth of ETH, a loan of $10,000 would be 300% collateralized and relatively safer against a price drop. A loan of $27,000 would be closer to the 110% minimum and a relatively small price drop in Ethereum would subject such a trove to liquidation."
Fee Mechanism
- From the docs (4-2021):
"There is a one-off fee whenever LUSD is borrowed, and when LUSD is redeemed:
- For borrowers, there is a borrowing fee on loans as a percentage of the drawn amount (in LUSD).
- For redeemers, there is a redemption fee on the amount paid to users by the system (in ETH) when exchanging LUSD for ETH. Note that redemption is separate from repaying your loan as a borrower, which is free of charge.
Both fees depend on the redemption volumes, i.e. they increase upon every redemption in function of the redeemed amount, and decay over time as long as no redemptions take place. The intent is to throttle large redemptions with higher fees, and to throttle borrowing directly after large redemption volumes. The fee decay over time ensures that the fee for both borrowers and redeemers will “cool down”, while redemptions volumes are low. The fees cannot become smaller than 0.5%
(except in Recovery Mode), which protects the redemption facility from being misused by arbitrageurs front-running the price feed. The borrowing fee is capped at 5%
, keeping the system (somewhat) attractive for borrowers even in phases where the monetary is contracting due to redemptions."
Upgrades
Staking
- From the announcement (4-5-2020):
"High-collateral borrowers and Stability Pool depositors provide stability to the system. They are rewarded for their roles by receiving collateral surplus gains from troves that are liquidated. In addition, the depositors will receive Growth Tokens (GT) as a kickback from front ends. GT can be staked in order to earn a proportion of the protocol revenue stemming from issuance and redemption fees."
"The protocol intends to distribute GT to two user groups: front-ends and stability pool depositors. Front-ends are applications/products that interact with the protocol. Front-end applications retain the ability to determine the kickback rate to its users. Therefore, products that interact with the Liquity are ultimately competing with the kickback rates of other applications."
- From the website (9-7-2021):
"The system captures the revenue from the borrowing and redemption fees and pays it out on a pro rata basis to the stakers of the LQTY token. The tokens can be staked and unstaked any time with no minimum lockup period."
- From Our Network (18-9-2021):
"Stability Pool pays out LQTY, which can then be staked to earn Liquity's protocol revenue generated from fees. Liquity has distributed $4.3M in protocol revenue to LQTY stakers since May and $14.6M has been distributed since our launch in April of this year."
Validator Stats
Liquidity Mining
Scaling
Interoperability
Other Details
Oracle Method
- From the announcement (4-5-2020):
"The value of LQTY in the system is fixed at $1. This means that at any time, a user can redeem 1 LQTY for its corresponding value in ETH. Whenever 1 LQTY trades below $1, holders and arbitrageurs are incentivized to redeem 1 LQTY for $1 worth of ETH. This helps to stabilize the price of LQTY through direct arbitrage rather than by relying on indirect monetary interventions like variable interest rates set by governance."
Privacy Method
Their Other Projects
Roadmap
- Can be found [Insert link here].
Usage
- From Our Network (12-2-2022):
"Numerous projects have adopted LUSD due to its decentralization, but the most notable are OlympusDAO, Fei Protocol, and Synthetix. Whether it's for the treasury, as a form of collateral, or as a source of yield, these projects have accumulated and utilized a combined 230m LUSD."
- Around 90% of the total LUSD supply is held in the Stability Pool. However, the stats are heavily skewed by some big whales that have deposited most or all of their borrowed LUSD to the Stability Pool (9-7-2021).
- Reached a TVL of $2.7B by 9-7-2021.
- From Our Network (22-5-2021):
"Liquity does not charge interest on loans, but instead charges a one-time borrow fee up front ranging from 0.5% to 5% (most often ~0.5%). The borrow fees combined with redemption fees are distributed directly to LQTY stakers and have generated >$10.3M in protocol revenue since launch."
- From Dose of DeFi (20-4-2021):
"Liquity reaches $1bn TVL in 10 days."
Projects that use or built on it
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Instant liquidation
- No interest tax.
Cons
Competition
- Fluity is a similar friendly fork of Liquity on BSC. Liquity currently has 'no oversight' over Fluity (10-5-2021).
- MakerDAO. From DeFi Rate (11-5-2020):
"There are a few major differences with Liquity. For one, there’s no stability fee or interest rate that accrues over time. Instead, depositors incur a one-time issuance fee when LQTY is minted and a one-time redemption fee when LQTY is redeemed for the underlying collateral – in this case Ether. In addition, Liquity features a significantly lower collateralization ratio of 110% compared to Maker’s 150%, effectively allowing depositors to draw more liquidity from the protocol with the same amount of ETH.
Second, one of the biggest drawbacks with the Maker system is the reliance on Keeper’s to liquidate under-collateralized vaults. Running a Maker Keeper bot requires some in-depth technical knowledge, creating some barriers to entry for participating in a critical piece of the system. This is ultimately what led to a significant amount of Vault owners being liquidated for 100% of their collateral during Black Thursday as millions in ETH was liquidated for 0 DAI.
To combat this, Liquity instead relies on stability pools to liquidate undercollateralized CDPs. These stability pools comprise of LQTY tokens that any user can deposit. If a CDP falls below 110% collateralization ratio, the position is liquidated and a corresponding amount of LQTY is burned. In return for depositing LQTY into the stability pool, users are given the ETH collateral distributed pro-rata to depositors at a discount (generally between 100 – 110% of the position’s value)."
Team, Funding, Partnerships, etc.
Team
- Full team can be found here (9-7-2021).
- Liquity AG is the developer of the code.
- Robert Lauko; founder & CEO, previously researcher at DFINITY.
Funding
- From Our Network (12-2-2022):
"Liquity has excelled in generating yield. Since launch, LUSD holders in the Stability Pool have earned ~67.5k ETH from liquidations at a ~9% discount, while LQTY stakers have earned ~$27m in revenue from protocol fees — an 86% increase from total revenue in September."
- Matter Labs; according to Matter Labs, the founders and leadership of a bunch of DeFi projects, among which this project, joined in on the $50m raise for zkSync (8-11-2021).
- From Cointelegraph (29-3-2021):
"Liquity Protocol has secured $6 million in Series A funding. The funding round was led by Pantera Capital, a crypto-focused venture capital firm, with additional contributions from Nima Capital, Alameda Research, Greenfield.one and IOSG, the company announced Monday. Angel investors including Meltem Demirors, David Hoffman and Calvin Liu also contributed to the raise."
"Raised $2.4M. The round was led by Polychain Capital, with follow on investments from a_capital, Lemniscap, 1kx, DFINITY Ecosystem Fund, Robot Ventures (Robert Leshner), and Alex Pack."
Partners
(:
Knowledge empowers all and will help us get closer to the decentralized world we all want to live in!
Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time.
If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to keep expanding this archive of information.
ETH tip address: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31
Also check out CoinTr.ee for more content.