Difference between revisions of "Celestia (TIA)"
m (1 revision imported) |
m (→Competition) |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A pluggable [[consensus]] and [[Data availability (DA)|data availability]] layer. Makes deploying a [[blockchain]] easy. | |||
==Basics== | ==Basics== | ||
*Based in: | *Based in: | ||
*Started in / Announced on: | *Started in / Announced on: | ||
*[[Testnet]] release: had their Devnet release in [https://celestia.org/#roadmap H2 of 2021], testnet planned in 2022 (3-1-2022) | *[[Testnet]] release: had their Devnet release in [https://celestia.org/#roadmap H2 of 2021], [[TestNet|testnet]] planned in 2022 (3-1-2022) Update: first [[TestNet|testnet]] [https://twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/1529477742294597632 launched] on 25-5-2022. | ||
*[[Mainnet]] release: [https://celestia.org/#roadmap Planned] (3-1-2022) in 2022 | *[[Mainnet]] release: [https://celestia.org/#roadmap Planned] (3-1-2022) in 2022 | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
* From its [https://celestia.org/faq/ FAQ] (3-1-2022): | * From its [https://celestia.org/faq/ FAQ] (3-1-2022): | ||
''"Celestia will have a token that will be used to secure the network via [[Proof-of-Stake (PoS)|Proof of Stake]], and to pay for [[Transaction Fee|transaction fees]] on the network. We plan to implement a fee-[[Burn Mechanisms|burn]] mechanism similar to [[EIP-1559]] in Ethereum so that burnt fees will offset new token issuance as Celestia gains adoption."'' | ''"Celestia will have a [[token]] that will be used to secure the network via [[Proof-of-Stake (PoS)|Proof of Stake]], and to pay for [[Transaction Fee|transaction fees]] on the network. We plan to implement a fee-[[Burn Mechanisms|burn]] mechanism similar to [[EIP-1559]] in [[Ethereum]] so that burnt [[fees]] will offset new token issuance as Celestia gains adoption."'' | ||
===Stablecoin=== | ===Stablecoin=== | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
*Built on: its own layer. | *Built on: its own layer. | ||
*Programming language used: | *Programming language used: Optimint ''"This is a replacement for [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] SDK's consensus framework [[Ignite (Company)|Tendermint]], that publishes blocks to Celestia instead of going through the Tendermint consensus process."'' [https://doseofdefi.substack.com/p/the-market-opportunity-of-modular 4-11-2022] | ||
*From its [https://celestia.org/ website] (3-1-2022): | *From its [https://celestia.org/ website] (3-1-2022): | ||
''"Celestia will support all flavors of [[rollups]], but we are initially focused on the [[Ethereum (ETH)|EVM]] and [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] SDK."'' | ''"Celestia will support all flavors of [[rollups]], but we are initially focused on the [[Ethereum (ETH)|EVM]] and [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] SDK."'' | ||
* | * According to this [https://twitter.com/sandraaleow/status/1477957814479851520 thread] (3-1-2022): Smart [[contracts]] can choose execution environment. | ||
====Transaction Details==== | ====Transaction Details==== | ||
*Capacity ([[TPS]]): | *Capacity ([[TPS]]): | ||
*[[Latency]]: | *[[Latency]]; from a [https://x.com/hmalviya9/status/1749029633574756449?s=20 thread] on different [[Data availability (DA)|DA]] layers (21-1-2024): ''"Celestia uses Tendermint, which is fast in terms of block finality time, but they also use a fraud-proof design to determine the accuracy of transactions."'' | ||
===How it works=== | ===How it works=== | ||
*[https://mirror.xyz/0x43930805dEBbF779fB8EDC8E43f988A8448Aad63/pb3N9RXQPVqYZRkMESlD9cqcQ96u1f7V6MPdsvzBvgo From] Analyst DAO (22-4-2022): | |||
''"Celestia [[node]] receives [[Rollups|rollup]] transaction (rollup transaction is submitted by a rollup node)'' | |||
# ''Celestia node ensures appropriate fees were paid'' | |||
# ''Nodes order the data (ie produce some sort of time sequencing for the TXs)'' | |||
# ''Attest to the data by collectively signing off on the [[Block|block’s]] integrity'' | |||
# ''Compartmentalize the data based on a DNS mapping that corresponds to a particular rollup that plugs into Celestia '' | |||
''And that’s it! Just receive transactions, and order them into [[blocks]]. Unironically, Celestia was previously called Lazy Ledger before rebranding, a nod to the intentionally minimal functionality that the protocol affords.'' | |||
''One of the interesting properties of Celestia is the versatility it affords for execution. As demonstrated above, Celestia provides a protocol for ordering transactions into some sort of time sequencing, then applying consensus to these transactions. While seemingly trivial, its importance cannot be understated. Now that we have a) a group of transactions within [[The Block|the block]] b) a collective view on the order in which these transactions appeared, any rollup node can apply transactions to its initial state in the ordering format as produced by Celestia, and compute the new state.'' | |||
''To stress this point further, the Celestia protocol is completely blind to the data within the transactions they are putting into blocks. It’s the rollup’s job to [[figure]] out how they want to interpret the data embedded within these transactions (i.e. the rollup themselves establish protocol rules).'' | |||
''There are two ways in which these rollups can configure their architecture to plug into Celestia:'' | |||
''1) Sovereign Rollups'' | |||
''2) Settlement Enforced Rollups (CEVMOS, Celestiums, etc)"'' | |||
*Acoording to this [https://twitter.com/sandraaleow/status/1477957814479851520 thread] (3-1-2022): | *Acoording to this [https://twitter.com/sandraaleow/status/1477957814479851520 thread] (3-1-2022): | ||
Anyone is allowed to post anything on chain (even invalid transactions). Nodes will download the transactions compute state of chain locally. Here is where data availability proofs comes to play. It ensures coding and it will download a few random pieces that can confirm whether a transaction is valid. This happens irrespective of how high the block is. | Anyone is allowed to post anything [[on chain]] (even invalid [[transactions]]). [[Nodes]] will download the transactions [[compute]] [[state]] of chain locally. Here is where data availability proofs comes to play. It ensures coding and it will download a few random pieces that can confirm whether a [[transaction]] is valid. This happens irrespective of how high the [[block]] is. | ||
*From its [https://celestia.org/ website] (3-1-2022): | *From its [https://celestia.org/ website] (3-1-2022): | ||
''"Celestia is a minimal blockchain that only orders and publishes transactions and does not execute them. By decoupling the consensus and application execution layers, Celestia modularizes the blockchain technology stack and unlocks new possibilities for decentralized application builders."'' | ''"Celestia is a minimal blockchain that only orders and publishes transactions and does not execute them. By decoupling the consensus and application execution layers, Celestia modularizes the blockchain technology stack and unlocks new possibilities for [[decentralized]] application builders."'' | ||
* From Ansem's Q1 [https://blknoiz06.substack.com/p/quarter-i-2022 report] (1-1-2022): | * From Ansem's Q1 [https://blknoiz06.substack.com/p/quarter-i-2022 report] (1-1-2022): | ||
''"They are building a blockchain dedicated to being the most efficient and decentralized data-availability layer and will be able to connect to other execution and settlement layers to complete the full modular stack. Since Celestia is only focused on data availability and ordering transactions, their methods for block verification can be simplified with data availability proofs. Essentially, each node in the network is required to sample a small piece of each block to confirm its’ validity and through this collective sampling the network comes to consensus. Because of this, as more nodes are added to the network, it actually increases the throughput of the entire system so the network benefits from being as decentralized as possible."'' | ''"They are building a blockchain dedicated to being the most efficient and decentralized data-availability layer and will be able to connect to other execution and settlement layers to complete the full [[Modular Scaling|modular]] stack. Since Celestia is only focused on data availability and ordering transactions, their methods for block verification can be simplified with data availability proofs. Essentially, each [[node]] in the network is required to sample a small piece of each block to confirm its’ validity and through this collective sampling the network comes to consensus. Because of this, as more nodes are added to the network, it actually increases the throughput of the entire system so the network benefits from being as decentralized as possible."'' | ||
===Fees=== | ===Fees=== | ||
===Upgrades=== | ===Upgrades=== | ||
* An upgrade to the [[testnet]] Mamaki is [https://blog.celestia.org/celestia-raises-55m-to-launch-modular-blockchain-network/ scheduled] (19-10-2022) for late October 2022. | |||
===Staking=== | ===Staking=== | ||
* Celestia [https://x.com/hmalviya9/status/1749029641539788913?s=20 supports] up to 100 validators (21-1-2024). | |||
====Validator Stats==== | ====Validator Stats==== | ||
===Liquidity Mining=== | ===Liquidity Mining=== | ||
Line 73: | Line 98: | ||
* From its [https://celestia.org/ website] (3-1-2022): | * From its [https://celestia.org/ website] (3-1-2022): | ||
''"Because Celestia does not validate [[Transaction (Tx)|transactions]], its throughput is not bottlenecked by state execution like traditional blockchains. Thanks to a property of data availability proofs, Celestia’s throughput scales with the number of users."'' | ''"Because Celestia does not validate [[Transaction (Tx)|transactions]], its throughput is not bottlenecked by state execution like traditional [[blockchains]]. Thanks to a property of data availability proofs, Celestia’s throughput scales with the number of users."'' | ||
* From its [https://celestia.org/faq/ FAQ] (3-1-2022): | * From its [https://celestia.org/faq/ FAQ] (3-1-2022): | ||
''"Celestia is able to scale as the number of users (light nodes) in the network increases. Celestia remains secure so long as there are enough nodes on the network to sample the entire block. This means that as more nodes join the network and sample, the block size can increase accordingly without sacrificing security or [[Decentralized|decentralization]]. Doing so on a traditional blockchain would sacrifice decentralization because a bigger block size would create a larger hardware requirement for nodes to download and verify data. Rollups also depend on data availability for their scalability, so better scaling potential for Celestia will also translate to better scaling potential for the rollups utilizing Celestia."'' | ''"Celestia is able to scale as the number of users (light nodes) in the network increases. Celestia remains secure so long as there are enough nodes on the network to sample the entire block. This means that as more nodes join the network and sample, the [[block size]] can increase accordingly without sacrificing security or [[Decentralized|decentralization]]. Doing so on a traditional blockchain would sacrifice [[decentralization]] because a bigger [[Block Size|block size]] would create a larger hardware requirement for nodes to download and verify data. Rollups also depend on data availability for their scalability, so better scaling potential for Celestia will also translate to better scaling potential for the rollups utilizing Celestia."'' | ||
===Interoperability=== | ===Interoperability=== | ||
===Other Details=== | ===Other Details=== | ||
==Oracle Method== | ==Oracle Method== | ||
==Their Other Projects== | ==Their Other Projects== | ||
=== CEVmos === | |||
* [https://medium.com/citadel-one/evmos-overview-9adc1ad3f4 From] [[Citadel One]] (1-3-2022): | |||
''"In December 2021, [[Evmos (EVMOS)|Evmos]] announced a partnership with Celestia to build CEvmos, Celestia-EVM on Cosmos. Celestia is a [[Layer One|layer 1]] built to handle data availability and settlement but not execution, allowing devs to utilize their own execution environment and using Celestia’s data availability and security.'' | |||
''CEVMos utilizes Celestia and EVMos to create a [[Modular Scaling|modular]] stack: EVMos for settlement, Celestia for data availability."'' | |||
==Roadmap== | ==Roadmap== | ||
* | *From their [https://blog.celestia.org/roadmap/ updated] [[roadmap]] (5-9-2024): | ||
''"A mix of technical innovations on the roadmap are paving the way to 1 gigabyte blocks, including a content-addressable mempool, compact blocks, optimizing CometBFT block propagation, internally sharding nodes, and an improved data availability sampling protocol."'' | |||
*Older one can be found [https://celestia.org/#roadmap here] (3-1-2022). | |||
==Usage== | ==Usage== | ||
Projects have been deploying the first 20 rollups and Celestia blobs represent 40% of total data published ([https://blog.celestia.org/roadmap/ 5-9-2024]). | |||
===Projects that use or built on it=== | ===Projects that use or built on it=== | ||
* [[Osmosis (OSMO)|Osmosis]] is expanding outside of [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] and into Celestia’s DA layer (11-8-2023). | |||
*From their [https://blog.celestia.org/celestia-raises-55m-to-launch-modular-blockchain-network/ blog] (20-10-2022): | |||
''"To date, modular blockchain projects such as Eclipse, Constellation and dYmension have chosen Celestia to be their data availability layer. Currently, Celestia is nurturing 26 projects in Modular Fellows, a new program that supports and mentors modular builders."'' | |||
==Competition== | ==Competition== | ||
* Has similarities with [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] and [[Polkadot (DOT)|Polkadot]], however within Celestia, its chains do not inherit the security of the main chain. | * From a [https://x.com/dabit3/status/1841893887939641856 comparison] (4-10-2024) written by someone who worked with both Celestia and EigenLayer: | ||
''"Celestia is a blockchain. Celestia focuses only on data availability and consensus and does not incorporate execution or settlement, instead offloading these to other actors in the network architecture who are also more specialized in their own feature set and functionality. Blocks in Celestia contain primarily transaction data, not state information. This focus on data rather than computation is what allows Celestia to scale for its purpose of offering more and cheaper data availability than what was possible or available before it launched. Unlike EigenDA, Celestia also supports sovereign rollups. This means developers can build rollups directly on Celestia without relying on Ethereum for settlement or security. This is an advantage for projects seeking more independence or different security models. A core takeaway is that Celestia is a blockchain and benefits from all of the properties of a blockchain while also having to adhere to the constraints, including consensus, data replication, network topology, leader selection, etc...'' | |||
''EigenDA is not a blockchain. EigenDA takes a minimalist approach to data availability. It operates without peer-to-peer networking, consensus mechanisms, or data replication, and lacks a central leader. This architecture enables scalability while still eliminating censorship bottlenecks. By leveraging erasure coding and direct data commitment to a decentralized network, EigenDA significantly reduces overhead typically associated with P2P systems and consensus protocols. EigenDA scales horizontally with the number of nodes, allowing for efficient utilization of bandwidth. Its design principles enable any node to encode and submit data directly, facilitating a highly incentive-compatible environment. This approach not only ensures high throughput and low latency but also supports features like self-verifiability and the potential for cryptoeconomic penalties through slashing and token forking if data becomes unavailable. TLDR: EigenDA is secure, inexpensive, and already has very high throughput relative to other solutions."'' | |||
*From a [https://x.com/hmalviya9/status/1749029633574756449?s=20 thread] on different [[Data availability (DA)|DA]] layers (21-1-2024): | |||
''"Celestia and [[Avail]] use large blocks, data availability sampling, and light nodes to serve increasing demand. EigenDA uses DACs, which are also considered scalable, but more [[centralized]]."'' | |||
*Has similarities with [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] and [[Polkadot (DOT)|Polkadot]], however within Celestia, its chains do not inherit the security of the [[main chain]]. | |||
*[[Avail]] works in a [https://doseofdefi.substack.com/p/the-market-opportunity-of-modular similar way], [[rollups]] do not (4-11-2022): | |||
''"Celestia and Polygon Avail (and probably others that we’re not yet aware of) are new blockchains that have been specially designed to solve the data availability problem, in what is called ‘modular blockchain’ architecture. These blockchains don't verify [[Transaction (Tx)|transactions]], but simply check that each [[block]] was added by [[Consensus Algorithm|consensus]] and that new blocks are available to the network.'' | |||
''Rollups do not post their blocks to a [[Smart Contract (SC)|smart contract]], but directly onto data availability chain as raw data. The Celestia consensus and data availability layer doesn’t interpret or perform computations on the rollup blocks, nor run an [[On Chain|on-chain]] [[Node|light client]] for the rollup."'' | |||
==Pros and Cons== | ==Pros and Cons== | ||
===Pros=== | ===Pros=== | ||
===Cons=== | ===Cons=== | ||
* Had recent investment from bankrupt FTX. This could mean fall-out risk. The [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xoYqw-5EjQIiunX75UzozzMPOspm0KwFzgA-SKBcvyo/edit#gid=0 investment] turned out to be $1.75M in tokens, this is before Celestia has announced a token (8-12-2022). | |||
==Team, Funding and Partners== | ==Team, Funding and Partners== | ||
===Team=== | ===Team=== | ||
Line 103: | Line 158: | ||
*Full team can be found [here]. | *Full team can be found [here]. | ||
*[https://blog.celestia.org/author/mustafa/ Mustafa] Al-Bassam, self-proclaimed co-founder of [[LulzSec]] | *[https://blog.celestia.org/author/mustafa/ Mustafa] Al-Bassam, self-proclaimed co-founder of [[LulzSec]] | ||
*Ismail Khoffi; co-founder, has been in the [[Cosmos (ATOM)|Cosmos]] ecosystem [https://blog.cosmos.network/cosmos-history-inception-to-prelaunch-b05bcb6a4b2b since 2018] while working at [[Tendermint|All In Bits]]. | |||
*"The community has already drafted or proposed 24 Celestia Improvement Proposals (CIPs), representing six different core dev entities." ([https://blog.celestia.org/roadmap/ 5-9-2024]) | |||
===== Advisors ===== | ===== Advisors ===== | ||
* [[Zaki Manian]] — Co-creator of IBC and early Cosmos contributor | * [[Zaki Manian]] — Co-creator of [[IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication)|IBC]] and early [[Cosmos]] contributor | ||
* [[Ethan Buchman]] — Co-founder of Tendermint and Co-founder of Cosmos | * [[Ethan Buchman]] — Co-founder of [[Tendermint]] and Co-founder of Cosmos | ||
* [[Morgan Beller]] — General Partner at NFX and Co-creator of [[Diem]]≋ (fka Libra) | * [[Morgan Beller]] — General Partner at NFX and Co-creator of [[Diem]]≋ (fka [[Libra]]) | ||
* [[Nick White]] — Co-founder of [[Harmony (ONE)|Harmony]] | * [[Nick White]] — Co-founder of [[Harmony (ONE)|Harmony]] | ||
* [[James Prestwich]] — Founder of [[Summa]] (acquired by [[Celo (CELO)|Celo]]) | * [[James Prestwich]] — Founder of [[Summa]] (acquired by [[Celo (CELO)|Celo]]) | ||
Line 115: | Line 172: | ||
===Funding=== | ===Funding=== | ||
* Celestia Labs closed a [https://blog.celestia.org/celestia-closes-1-5m-seed-fundraise-from-interchain-foundation-binance-labs-maven-11-capital-kr1-and-others/ $1.5m seed fundraise] (3-3-2021) from [[Interchain Foundation]], [[Binance|Binance Labs]], [[Maven11|Maven 11 Capital]], [[KR1]], and others | * Raised [https://blog.celestia.org/celestia-foundation-raise/ $100M in new funding] (24-9-2024): | ||
''"Led by [[Bain Capital Ventures|Bain Capital Crypto]] with [[Syncracy Capital]], [[Robot Ventures]], [[1kx]], and [[Placeholder]] participating."'' | |||
*[https://blog.celestia.org/celestia-raises-55m-to-launch-modular-blockchain-network/ Announced] a $55M raise (25-10-2022): | |||
''"Led by [[Bain Capital Ventures|Bain Capital Crypto]] and [[Polychain Capital]] with participation from [[Placeholder]], [[Galaxy Digital|Galaxy]], [[Delphi Digital]], [[Blockchain Capital]], [[NFX]], [[Protocol Labs]], [[Figment]], Maven 11, [[Spartan Group]], [[FTX (FTT)|FTX]] Ventures, [[Jump Crypto]], and select angels including [[Balaji Srinivasan]], [[Eric Wall]] and [[Jutta Steiner]]."'' | |||
*Celestia Labs closed a [https://blog.celestia.org/celestia-closes-1-5m-seed-fundraise-from-interchain-foundation-binance-labs-maven-11-capital-kr1-and-others/ $1.5m seed fundraise] (3-3-2021) from [[Interchain Foundation]], [[Binance|Binance Labs]], [[Maven11|Maven 11 Capital]], [[KR1]], and others | |||
=== Partner === | |||
* [https://doseofdefi.substack.com/p/the-market-opportunity-of-modular From] [[Dose Of DeFi|Dose of DeFi]] (4-11-2022): | |||
''"Celestia’s first partners (or ‘[https://blog.celestia.org/meet-cohort-one-of-modular-fellows/ Modular Fellows]’, as it calls them) are mostly projects that enable easier rollup deployment by utilizing Celestia’s data architecture, which is designed to store rollup data, not transactions. Important examples include:'' | |||
# ''[https://twitter.com/dYmensionXYZ dYmension]: ‘Home of the RollApps’. This allows rollups to issue tokens and choose which data availability layer to use (e.g. Celestia or [[Polygon|Polygon Avail]]).'' | |||
# ''[https://altlayer.io/ AltLayer]: Ethereum-compatible tailored rollups-as-a-service. These are high-throughput ‘disposable’ rollups, where NFTs are minted and then [[Bridge|bridged]] to an L1.'' | |||
# ''[https://twitter.com/EclipseFND Eclipse]: Rollups using the [[Solana (SOL)|Solana]] [[Virtual Machine (VM)|VM]] and the Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol."'' | |||
*From this [https://twitter.com/analystdao/status/1491171970347855872?s=21 thread] (9-2-2022): | |||
''"In mid‐Dec. 2021, [[Evmos (EVMOS)|EVMos]] announced partnership with Celestia to build modular tech [[stack]] for EVM [[Decentralized Applications (DApps)|dApps]]; it will be [[Rollups|rollup]] centric at the execution layer ‐ Data availability: Celestia ‐ Settlement: [[EVMos]] EVM ‐ Execution: [[rollups]] (zk‐RU or optimistic RU)"'' | |||
==(:== | ==(:== | ||
Knowledge empowers all and will help us get closer to the [[decentralised|decentralized]] world we all want to live in! | Knowledge empowers all and will help us get closer to the [[decentralised|decentralized]] world we all want to live in! |
Latest revision as of 04:06, 16 October 2024
A pluggable consensus and data availability layer. Makes deploying a blockchain easy.
Basics
- Based in:
- Started in / Announced on:
- Testnet release: had their Devnet release in H2 of 2021, testnet planned in 2022 (3-1-2022) Update: first testnet launched on 25-5-2022.
- Mainnet release: Planned (3-1-2022) in 2022
History
Audits & Exploits
- Bug bounty program can be found [insert here].
Bugs/Exploits
Governance
Admin Keys
DAO
Treasury
Token
Launch
Token Allocation
Utility
Other Details
- From its FAQ (3-1-2022):
"Celestia will have a token that will be used to secure the network via Proof of Stake, and to pay for transaction fees on the network. We plan to implement a fee-burn mechanism similar to EIP-1559 in Ethereum so that burnt fees will offset new token issuance as Celestia gains adoption."
Stablecoin
Coin Distribution
Technology
- Whitepaper or docs can be found [insert here].
- Code can be viewed here.
Implementations
- Built on: its own layer.
- Programming language used: Optimint "This is a replacement for Cosmos SDK's consensus framework Tendermint, that publishes blocks to Celestia instead of going through the Tendermint consensus process." 4-11-2022
- From its website (3-1-2022):
"Celestia will support all flavors of rollups, but we are initially focused on the EVM and Cosmos SDK."
Transaction Details
- Capacity (TPS):
- Latency; from a thread on different DA layers (21-1-2024): "Celestia uses Tendermint, which is fast in terms of block finality time, but they also use a fraud-proof design to determine the accuracy of transactions."
How it works
- From Analyst DAO (22-4-2022):
"Celestia node receives rollup transaction (rollup transaction is submitted by a rollup node)
- Celestia node ensures appropriate fees were paid
- Nodes order the data (ie produce some sort of time sequencing for the TXs)
- Attest to the data by collectively signing off on the block’s integrity
- Compartmentalize the data based on a DNS mapping that corresponds to a particular rollup that plugs into Celestia
And that’s it! Just receive transactions, and order them into blocks. Unironically, Celestia was previously called Lazy Ledger before rebranding, a nod to the intentionally minimal functionality that the protocol affords.
One of the interesting properties of Celestia is the versatility it affords for execution. As demonstrated above, Celestia provides a protocol for ordering transactions into some sort of time sequencing, then applying consensus to these transactions. While seemingly trivial, its importance cannot be understated. Now that we have a) a group of transactions within the block b) a collective view on the order in which these transactions appeared, any rollup node can apply transactions to its initial state in the ordering format as produced by Celestia, and compute the new state.
To stress this point further, the Celestia protocol is completely blind to the data within the transactions they are putting into blocks. It’s the rollup’s job to figure out how they want to interpret the data embedded within these transactions (i.e. the rollup themselves establish protocol rules).
There are two ways in which these rollups can configure their architecture to plug into Celestia:
1) Sovereign Rollups
2) Settlement Enforced Rollups (CEVMOS, Celestiums, etc)"
- Acoording to this thread (3-1-2022):
Anyone is allowed to post anything on chain (even invalid transactions). Nodes will download the transactions compute state of chain locally. Here is where data availability proofs comes to play. It ensures coding and it will download a few random pieces that can confirm whether a transaction is valid. This happens irrespective of how high the block is.
- From its website (3-1-2022):
"Celestia is a minimal blockchain that only orders and publishes transactions and does not execute them. By decoupling the consensus and application execution layers, Celestia modularizes the blockchain technology stack and unlocks new possibilities for decentralized application builders."
- From Ansem's Q1 report (1-1-2022):
"They are building a blockchain dedicated to being the most efficient and decentralized data-availability layer and will be able to connect to other execution and settlement layers to complete the full modular stack. Since Celestia is only focused on data availability and ordering transactions, their methods for block verification can be simplified with data availability proofs. Essentially, each node in the network is required to sample a small piece of each block to confirm its’ validity and through this collective sampling the network comes to consensus. Because of this, as more nodes are added to the network, it actually increases the throughput of the entire system so the network benefits from being as decentralized as possible."
Fees
Upgrades
Staking
- Celestia supports up to 100 validators (21-1-2024).
Validator Stats
Liquidity Mining
Scaling
- From its website (3-1-2022):
"Because Celestia does not validate transactions, its throughput is not bottlenecked by state execution like traditional blockchains. Thanks to a property of data availability proofs, Celestia’s throughput scales with the number of users."
- From its FAQ (3-1-2022):
"Celestia is able to scale as the number of users (light nodes) in the network increases. Celestia remains secure so long as there are enough nodes on the network to sample the entire block. This means that as more nodes join the network and sample, the block size can increase accordingly without sacrificing security or decentralization. Doing so on a traditional blockchain would sacrifice decentralization because a bigger block size would create a larger hardware requirement for nodes to download and verify data. Rollups also depend on data availability for their scalability, so better scaling potential for Celestia will also translate to better scaling potential for the rollups utilizing Celestia."
Interoperability
Other Details
Oracle Method
Their Other Projects
CEVmos
- From Citadel One (1-3-2022):
"In December 2021, Evmos announced a partnership with Celestia to build CEvmos, Celestia-EVM on Cosmos. Celestia is a layer 1 built to handle data availability and settlement but not execution, allowing devs to utilize their own execution environment and using Celestia’s data availability and security.
CEVMos utilizes Celestia and EVMos to create a modular stack: EVMos for settlement, Celestia for data availability."
Roadmap
"A mix of technical innovations on the roadmap are paving the way to 1 gigabyte blocks, including a content-addressable mempool, compact blocks, optimizing CometBFT block propagation, internally sharding nodes, and an improved data availability sampling protocol."
- Older one can be found here (3-1-2022).
Usage
Projects have been deploying the first 20 rollups and Celestia blobs represent 40% of total data published (5-9-2024).
Projects that use or built on it
- Osmosis is expanding outside of Cosmos and into Celestia’s DA layer (11-8-2023).
- From their blog (20-10-2022):
"To date, modular blockchain projects such as Eclipse, Constellation and dYmension have chosen Celestia to be their data availability layer. Currently, Celestia is nurturing 26 projects in Modular Fellows, a new program that supports and mentors modular builders."
Competition
- From a comparison (4-10-2024) written by someone who worked with both Celestia and EigenLayer:
"Celestia is a blockchain. Celestia focuses only on data availability and consensus and does not incorporate execution or settlement, instead offloading these to other actors in the network architecture who are also more specialized in their own feature set and functionality. Blocks in Celestia contain primarily transaction data, not state information. This focus on data rather than computation is what allows Celestia to scale for its purpose of offering more and cheaper data availability than what was possible or available before it launched. Unlike EigenDA, Celestia also supports sovereign rollups. This means developers can build rollups directly on Celestia without relying on Ethereum for settlement or security. This is an advantage for projects seeking more independence or different security models. A core takeaway is that Celestia is a blockchain and benefits from all of the properties of a blockchain while also having to adhere to the constraints, including consensus, data replication, network topology, leader selection, etc...
EigenDA is not a blockchain. EigenDA takes a minimalist approach to data availability. It operates without peer-to-peer networking, consensus mechanisms, or data replication, and lacks a central leader. This architecture enables scalability while still eliminating censorship bottlenecks. By leveraging erasure coding and direct data commitment to a decentralized network, EigenDA significantly reduces overhead typically associated with P2P systems and consensus protocols. EigenDA scales horizontally with the number of nodes, allowing for efficient utilization of bandwidth. Its design principles enable any node to encode and submit data directly, facilitating a highly incentive-compatible environment. This approach not only ensures high throughput and low latency but also supports features like self-verifiability and the potential for cryptoeconomic penalties through slashing and token forking if data becomes unavailable. TLDR: EigenDA is secure, inexpensive, and already has very high throughput relative to other solutions."
"Celestia and Avail use large blocks, data availability sampling, and light nodes to serve increasing demand. EigenDA uses DACs, which are also considered scalable, but more centralized."
- Has similarities with Cosmos and Polkadot, however within Celestia, its chains do not inherit the security of the main chain.
- Avail works in a similar way, rollups do not (4-11-2022):
"Celestia and Polygon Avail (and probably others that we’re not yet aware of) are new blockchains that have been specially designed to solve the data availability problem, in what is called ‘modular blockchain’ architecture. These blockchains don't verify transactions, but simply check that each block was added by consensus and that new blocks are available to the network.
Rollups do not post their blocks to a smart contract, but directly onto data availability chain as raw data. The Celestia consensus and data availability layer doesn’t interpret or perform computations on the rollup blocks, nor run an on-chain light client for the rollup."
Pros and Cons
Pros
Cons
- Had recent investment from bankrupt FTX. This could mean fall-out risk. The investment turned out to be $1.75M in tokens, this is before Celestia has announced a token (8-12-2022).
Team, Funding and Partners
Team
- Full team can be found [here].
- Mustafa Al-Bassam, self-proclaimed co-founder of LulzSec
- Ismail Khoffi; co-founder, has been in the Cosmos ecosystem since 2018 while working at All In Bits.
- "The community has already drafted or proposed 24 Celestia Improvement Proposals (CIPs), representing six different core dev entities." (5-9-2024)
Advisors
- Zaki Manian — Co-creator of IBC and early Cosmos contributor
- Ethan Buchman — Co-founder of Tendermint and Co-founder of Cosmos
- Morgan Beller — General Partner at NFX and Co-creator of Diem≋ (fka Libra)
- Nick White — Co-founder of Harmony
- James Prestwich — Founder of Summa (acquired by Celo)
- George Danezis — Professor of Security and Privacy Engineering at University College London
Funding
- Raised $100M in new funding (24-9-2024):
"Led by Bain Capital Crypto with Syncracy Capital, Robot Ventures, 1kx, and Placeholder participating."
- Announced a $55M raise (25-10-2022):
"Led by Bain Capital Crypto and Polychain Capital with participation from Placeholder, Galaxy, Delphi Digital, Blockchain Capital, NFX, Protocol Labs, Figment, Maven 11, Spartan Group, FTX Ventures, Jump Crypto, and select angels including Balaji Srinivasan, Eric Wall and Jutta Steiner."
- Celestia Labs closed a $1.5m seed fundraise (3-3-2021) from Interchain Foundation, Binance Labs, Maven 11 Capital, KR1, and others
Partner
- From Dose of DeFi (4-11-2022):
"Celestia’s first partners (or ‘Modular Fellows’, as it calls them) are mostly projects that enable easier rollup deployment by utilizing Celestia’s data architecture, which is designed to store rollup data, not transactions. Important examples include:
- dYmension: ‘Home of the RollApps’. This allows rollups to issue tokens and choose which data availability layer to use (e.g. Celestia or Polygon Avail).
- AltLayer: Ethereum-compatible tailored rollups-as-a-service. These are high-throughput ‘disposable’ rollups, where NFTs are minted and then bridged to an L1.
- Eclipse: Rollups using the Solana VM and the Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol."
- From this thread (9-2-2022):
"In mid‐Dec. 2021, EVMos announced partnership with Celestia to build modular tech stack for EVM dApps; it will be rollup centric at the execution layer ‐ Data availability: Celestia ‐ Settlement: EVMos EVM ‐ Execution: rollups (zk‐RU or optimistic RU)"
(:
Knowledge empowers all and will help us get closer to the decentralized world we all want to live in!
Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time.
If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to keep expanding this archive of information.