Difference between revisions of "Ichi Protocol (ICHI)"
m (1 revision imported) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Ichi]] protocol allows users to create “branded” stablecoins such as oneUNI (based on the [[Uniswap]] UNI [[token]]) or oneBTC (based on [[WBTC]]). | |||
==Basics== | ==Basics== | ||
Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
*[[Testnet]] release: | *[[Testnet]] release: | ||
*[[Mainnet]] release: | *[[Mainnet]] release: | ||
==Audits & Exploits== | |||
*[[Bug bounty]] program can be found [insert here]. | |||
*[https://defisafety.com/2021/05/06/ichi/ Scored] a 59% on [[DeFi Safety]] (6-5-2021); ''"An [https://github.com/ichifarm/audit/blob/main/Ichi_Farm_Audit_Bramah.pdf audit] was published by [[Bramah Systems]] in October 2020. Ichi [[farms]] was released in November 2020."'' With the [https://t.me/c/1453353094/2982 comment]: ''"Very low software docs and testing scores hurt them. More work in these core areas needed."'' | |||
===Bugs/Exploits=== | |||
* [https://newsletter.tally.xyz/p/the-tally-newsletter-issue-69?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo1MjI5ODE2MCwiXyI6ImR6bWdYIiwiaWF0IjoxNjUwMjUyMDQyLCJleHAiOjE2NTAyNTU2NDIsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0xMTE2NTMiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.0nnH6maz54FUL85GZIlCzM6C6KYBFUyeDqBU035SVDo&s=r From] [[Tally]] (16-4-2022): | |||
''"Excessive leverage on the protocol’s native ICHI token resulted in a [[wave]] of insolvent loans and negative impact on linked [[algorithmic stablecoins]]. Ichi protocol was top of mind over the past week due to serious disruption of their lending pool based on [[Rari Capital (RFT)|Rari Capital]]’s [[Fuse]] protocol. While the pool was not directly involved in Ichi protocol collateralization mechanisms, it kicked off a general market panic that triggered loss of peg for Ichi’s flagship oneUNI [[Stablecoins|stablecoin]].'' | |||
''With the fuse pool allowing over 5x leverage on ICHI token collateral, many loans quickly became insolvent as their collateral was no longer worth more than the borrowed amount. In hindsight, allowing such high leverage against the relatively illiquid ICHI token was a recipe for disaster. The Ichi fuse pool was oneUNI stablecoin’s largest supply [[sink]] (with borrowing [[fees]] as well as ICHI [[liquidity]] incentives), so the pool’s collapse led to a severe demand shock. With the stablecoin’s backing already falling due to decline in the price of UNI, there was insufficient [[USDC]] to meet all redemption requests and the [[stablecoin]] broke below peg.'' | |||
''While exact backing percentage and potential haircuts are still up in the air, oneUNI holders can likely only expect to see a fraction of their initial investment. Other Ichi stablecoins such as oneBTC have remained stable due to better treasury performance, but they remain broadly vulnerable to similar price and demand risks experienced by oneUNI. Initial signs of stress are already appearing in the oneBTC [[liquidity pool]] which is heavily unbalanced with minimal USDC exit liquidity remaining."'' | |||
== | ==Governance== | ||
===Admin Keys=== | |||
=== DAO=== | |||
===Treasury=== | |||
==Token== | ==Token== | ||
===Launch=== | ===Launch=== | ||
Line 12: | Line 29: | ||
===Utility=== | ===Utility=== | ||
===Other Details=== | ===Other Details=== | ||
==Coin Distribution== | ==Coin Distribution== | ||
==Technology== | ==Technology == | ||
*[[Whitepaper]] or docs can be found [insert here]. | |||
*[[Whitepaper]] can be found [insert here]. | |||
*Code can be viewed [insert here]. | *Code can be viewed [insert here]. | ||
===Implementations=== | ===Implementations=== | ||
*Built on: | |||
===How it works=== | |||
* | * [https://newsletter.tally.xyz/p/the-tally-newsletter-issue-69?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMzk3OTAwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo1MjI5ODE2MCwiXyI6ImR6bWdYIiwiaWF0IjoxNjUwMjUyMDQyLCJleHAiOjE2NTAyNTU2NDIsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0xMTE2NTMiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.0nnH6maz54FUL85GZIlCzM6C6KYBFUyeDqBU035SVDo&s=r From] [[Tally]] (16-4-2022): | ||
''"Ichi protocol allows users to create “branded” [[stablecoins]] such as oneUNI (based on the [[Uniswap (UNI)|Uniswap]] UNI token) or oneBTC (based on [[Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC)|WBTC]]). Similar to [[Frax Finance (FRAX)|FRAX]], Ichi stablecoins use [[fractional]] algorithmic backing and [[arbitrage]] incentives to maintain peg; when above $1, users can mint stablecoins with a mix of [[US Dollar Coin (USDC)|USDC]] and the given stablecoins base asset (eg. UNI for oneUNI), while redemptions below peg are backstopped 100% with USDC. This ensures tight peg in normal conditions and allows for a stablecoin’s reserves to gain from upside in the base token. But if a rush of withdrawal requests and exits correspond with price falls in the base token, there may be insufficient reserves for all stablecoin holders to withdraw $1; this creates negative bank run dynamics where users rush to be first to withdraw their funds if they fear insufficient collateralization.'' | |||
''One of Ichi’s products is so called “angel vaults”, which are automated Uniswap v3 strategies creating buy walls just below the current market price of a given token. While this can help build price support in the short term, it was used excessively to boost ICHI’s token price in the lead up to the market crash and lending pool insolvency."'' | |||
=== | ===Fees=== | ||
=== | ===Upgrades === | ||
===Staking=== | === Staking=== | ||
====Validator Stats==== | ====Validator Stats==== | ||
===Liquidity Mining=== | ===Liquidity Mining=== | ||
===Scaling=== | === Scaling=== | ||
===Interoperability=== | ===Interoperability=== | ||
===Other Details= | === Other Details=== | ||
==Oracle Method== | ==Oracle Method== | ||
==Their Other Projects== | ==Their Other Projects== | ||
==Roadmap== | ==Roadmap== | ||
*Can be found [Insert link here]. | *Can be found [Insert link here]. | ||
==Usage== | ==Usage== | ||
===Projects that use or built on it=== | ===Projects that use or built on it=== | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
===Pros=== | ===Pros=== | ||
===Cons=== | ===Cons=== | ||
==Team, Funding, | ==Team, Funding, Partners== | ||
===Team=== | ===Team=== | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time. | Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time. | ||
If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to keep expanding this archive of information. | If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to [[keep]] expanding this archive of information. | ||
[[ETH]] tip [[address]]: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31 | [[ETH]] tip [[address]]: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31 |
Latest revision as of 04:40, 18 April 2022
Ichi protocol allows users to create “branded” stablecoins such as oneUNI (based on the Uniswap UNI token) or oneBTC (based on WBTC).
Basics
Audits & Exploits
- Bug bounty program can be found [insert here].
- Scored a 59% on DeFi Safety (6-5-2021); "An audit was published by Bramah Systems in October 2020. Ichi farms was released in November 2020." With the comment: "Very low software docs and testing scores hurt them. More work in these core areas needed."
Bugs/Exploits
"Excessive leverage on the protocol’s native ICHI token resulted in a wave of insolvent loans and negative impact on linked algorithmic stablecoins. Ichi protocol was top of mind over the past week due to serious disruption of their lending pool based on Rari Capital’s Fuse protocol. While the pool was not directly involved in Ichi protocol collateralization mechanisms, it kicked off a general market panic that triggered loss of peg for Ichi’s flagship oneUNI stablecoin.
With the fuse pool allowing over 5x leverage on ICHI token collateral, many loans quickly became insolvent as their collateral was no longer worth more than the borrowed amount. In hindsight, allowing such high leverage against the relatively illiquid ICHI token was a recipe for disaster. The Ichi fuse pool was oneUNI stablecoin’s largest supply sink (with borrowing fees as well as ICHI liquidity incentives), so the pool’s collapse led to a severe demand shock. With the stablecoin’s backing already falling due to decline in the price of UNI, there was insufficient USDC to meet all redemption requests and the stablecoin broke below peg.
While exact backing percentage and potential haircuts are still up in the air, oneUNI holders can likely only expect to see a fraction of their initial investment. Other Ichi stablecoins such as oneBTC have remained stable due to better treasury performance, but they remain broadly vulnerable to similar price and demand risks experienced by oneUNI. Initial signs of stress are already appearing in the oneBTC liquidity pool which is heavily unbalanced with minimal USDC exit liquidity remaining."
Governance
Admin Keys
DAO
Treasury
Token
Launch
Token Allocation
Utility
Other Details
Coin Distribution
Technology
- Whitepaper or docs can be found [insert here].
- Code can be viewed [insert here].
Implementations
- Built on:
How it works
"Ichi protocol allows users to create “branded” stablecoins such as oneUNI (based on the Uniswap UNI token) or oneBTC (based on WBTC). Similar to FRAX, Ichi stablecoins use fractional algorithmic backing and arbitrage incentives to maintain peg; when above $1, users can mint stablecoins with a mix of USDC and the given stablecoins base asset (eg. UNI for oneUNI), while redemptions below peg are backstopped 100% with USDC. This ensures tight peg in normal conditions and allows for a stablecoin’s reserves to gain from upside in the base token. But if a rush of withdrawal requests and exits correspond with price falls in the base token, there may be insufficient reserves for all stablecoin holders to withdraw $1; this creates negative bank run dynamics where users rush to be first to withdraw their funds if they fear insufficient collateralization.
One of Ichi’s products is so called “angel vaults”, which are automated Uniswap v3 strategies creating buy walls just below the current market price of a given token. While this can help build price support in the short term, it was used excessively to boost ICHI’s token price in the lead up to the market crash and lending pool insolvency."
Fees
Upgrades
Staking
Validator Stats
Liquidity Mining
Scaling
Interoperability
Other Details
Oracle Method
Their Other Projects
Roadmap
- Can be found [Insert link here].
Usage
Projects that use or built on it
Competition
Pros and Cons
Pros
Cons
Team, Funding, Partners
Team
- Full team can be found [here].
Funding
Partners
(:
Knowledge empowers all and will help us get closer to the decentralised world we all want to live in!
Making these free wiki pages is fun but takes a lot of effort and time.
If you have enjoyed reading, tips are appreciated :) This will help us to keep expanding this archive of information.
ETH tip address: 0x83460bE5F218b1520B69D702cE60A1DE37dD8E31
Also check out CoinTr.ee for more content.